NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) said his Catholic beliefs are part of who he is as a politician. But critics pointed out that Santorum’s positions at times contradict church doctrine, most notably on Santorum’s support for the death penalty and the war in Iraq. (Photo by Ralph Wilson/AP)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
 
Catholics divided
Some say the church overstepped its authority, others welcome guidance

HOME > NEWS > RELIGION NEWS

Aug 08, 2003  |  By: JOE CREA  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

ROME — The Vatican issued a document last week reiterating its position that “homosexuality is a troubling moral and social phenomenon,” and instructing Catholic politicians that they are “obliged to oppose” same-sex unions for the “common good.” Politicians were warned that supporting gay marriage rights would be “gravely immoral.”

The Vatican — the body responsible for policing Roman Catholic orthodoxy — said legal recognition of same-sex unions “would obscure certain basic moral values and cause a devaluation of the institution of marriage.” Church officials made the statement in a report titled “Considerations Regarding Proposals to Give Legal Recognition to Unions Between Homosexual Couples.”

The 12-page document also says that children adopted by gay parents would be exposed to “violence … in the sense that their condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development.”

Marianne Duddy, executive director of Dignity/USA, the nation’s largest group of gay Catholics, harshly criticized the document, calling it “vicious” and “unfounded.”

“Two things bother me the most about the document,” Duddy said. “One, is the absolute arrogance that the Vatican has the right to impose their own moral value system on the entire citizenry of democratic countries. And then, of course, is that same-sex couples expose children to violence. How can the Vatican, with the mess that they made, dare to make such unfounded and vicious claims against gay and lesbian couples who are providing homes to children in society that no one else wants?”

A spokesperson for the Catholic Archdiocese of Washington said that there is “nothing new” in the document released by the Vatican regarding church teaching on the issue of same-sex unions and added that the church will continue to teach love for everyone and instruct, in a “positive way,” the church’s understanding of marriage.


Pressuring Catholic politicians?
The Vatican’s position regarding gay marriage and adoption was not new to many Catholics, but gay activists and proponents of Catholic Church reform said that the language in the document was more vitriolic than that in other position papers. Also, many said they were upset at the suggestion that Catholic politicians should take “marching orders” from the Vatican.

Democrat presidential hopeful Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) rebuked the Vatican for the suggestion that Catholic politicians have a “moral duty” to oppose same-sex unions.

“ I believe in the church, and I care about it enormously,” Kerry told the Associated Press. “But I think that it’s important to not have the church instructing politicians. That is an inappropriate crossing of the line in America.”

Kerry, who opposes gay marriage, said that same-sex couples should have the same legal recognition as married couples.

Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) said on Fox News Sunday that he disagrees “dramatically” with Kerry’s statement and said that it is his “right as a Catholic politician to uphold the values that I believe are important to me, and important, that I believe, for this country.”

Prominent Catholic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) said in a statement that while the church is free to determine what marriage is, it is the job of the government, not the church, “to say who can be married in a civil sense.”

Kennedy’s brother, President John F. Kennedy, overcame widespread fears when he sought the presidency in 1960 that should he be elected, he would receive political orders from the Vatican.

This is the second time this year that the Vatican has attempted to influence Catholic politicians. In January, Pope John Paul II signed a “doctrinal note” sent to political leaders that discussed how much leeway Catholic politicians have when making decisions on moral issues.


Praise from conservatives
Social conservatives have praised the Vatican document. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops “welcomed” the considerations and said the purpose was to protect the “common good” and “preservation of the family.”

Other conservatives, like Pia de Solenni, a moral theologian and fellow at the conservative Family Research Council, wrote in a recent article that Catholic politicians, “can’t hide behind the veil of so-called ‘personal belief’ and not articulate opposition to laws supporting same-sex unions.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. trong>John Kerry (D-Mass.), who is a Catholic, said the Vatican has no business instructing politicians on how to vote. (Photo by Luis Gomez)

“Politicians who wish to publicly identify themselves as Catholic must be accordingly open about their Catholic beliefs, and they have to vote accordingly. Being Catholic carries with it a responsibility to ...

Page 1 Page 2 continue reading


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!