PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS  
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2008
 
Please login or create a new account
  ?
Holiday Gift Guide - Issue One
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 WORLD NEWS
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 CALENDARS
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION














EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


A voter referendum to ban gay marriage in the District is dead — for now. But the woman who wanted to bring the issue to D.C. voters says she is regrouping and will resubmit the paperwork to start the process again. (File photo by Al Goldis/AP)




Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article







 

MORE LOCAL

Catania may push marriage bill in Jan.
Some fear time isn’t right after Prop 8’s success

Equality Md. names new executive director
Lesbian will ‘move forward with marriage equality’ in state

Two gay Obama supporters assaulted near White House

D.C. Council to hold hearing on hate crimes

D.C. police shoot, kill gay man in townhouse

Local news in brief
22 gay incumbents re-elected to ANCs

Obituary
Bill Gillespie, 62

Police log


LOCAL

More Local News
D.C. gay marriage ban petition withdrawn


Friday, November 19, 2004

A D.C. woman who said she believes gay marriage is harmful to African-American families withdrew a petition to place an initiative on the ballot to ban same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia. Ward 4 resident Lisa L. Greene said she withdrew the proposal after an attorney with the D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics informed her that she used the wrong “legislative format” in drafting the initiative and she failed to submit a required campaign finance statement. “I will submit it again,” she told the Blade. “I will contact them beforehand and make sure I have it correct.” Greene said she created a group called Citizens For Marriage to promote the initiative. But she made no public announcement about the measure. Gay activists and the media did not learn about her initiative effort until the elections board published an announcement about a board hearing on the matter in the D.C. Register two weeks ago. The hearing, which was scheduled for Nov. 18, was cancelled this week after Greene withdrew her petition. Under the city’s election law, Greene must obtain petition signatures from 5 percent of the registered voters in the District — more than 19,000 signatures — within 180 days of the election board’s approval of the text of her initiative in order to place the measure on the ballot. Bill O’Field, a spokesperson for the elections board, said Greene’s initiative could not be placed on the ballot until the next regularly scheduled citywide election, which takes place in September 2006. The text of Greene’s proposed initiative states, “The Citizens of the District of Columbia and the District Council defines and preserve marriage as a relationship between one man and one woman only.” Greene named the initiative the District of Columbia Marriage Protection Act. “As an African American, I feel it’s important to preserve the family,” Greene said. “Statistics show that African Americans have the nation’s highest rate of out-of-marriage births.” Greene did not elaborate on how this is related to same-sex marriage.
LOU CHIBBARO JR.

D.C. gay community center to open in office building
Organizers of D.C.’s planned gay community center announced this week they have joined two other gay groups in renting space in a downtown office building, providing the center with its first official home since it formed more than five years ago. The center and the D.C.-based groups Brother Help Thyself and the Metro D.C. chapter of Parents, Families, & Friends of Lesbians & Gays will share a 2,500 square foot office suite on the third floor of a high rise office building at 1111 14th Street, NW, according to a news release issued by the center. “We’re happy to be moving into this interim space while we continue to pursue our permanent home,” said Patrick Menasco, president of the center’s board of directors. “This facility will be home base for us and for GLBT community groups,” he said. “The community room portion of the new space may also be available for rent to GLBT groups for meetings, performances and receptions.” Colleen Dermody, a member of the community center’s board, said the center and the two other groups will pay about $825 per month each in rent for the space. The three groups expect to move into the new space this weekend but the center won’t be open to the public until January, Dermody said. She said Dupont Circle’s Stead Park remains on the center’s “short list of preferred sites” for its permanent home. Menasco last year announced the center planned to seek approval from the city to lease the park and hoped to build a center headquarters building and underground parking lot on the site. The center would maintain the park, which would remain open to the public, Menasco said, with the center’s “footprint” said to cover only a small part of the park’s land. Some Dupont Circle residents and civic activists have expressed opposition to the proposal, saying the park should be spruced up but remain in its current state.
LOU CHIBBARO JR.

Charlottesville calls for end to Va. civil unions ban
The Charlottesville City Council passed a resolution on Monday urging the Virginia General Assembly to repeal the state’s ban on civil unions. In a 4-1 symbolic statement, the Council sought to repeal House Bill 751 or the Marriage Affirmation Act that bans civil unions and prohibits legal arrangements for gay couples. Councilmember Rob Schilling, the only Republican on the council, was the lone dissenter. Charlottesville Councilmember Blake Caravati, who authored the resolution, said he “firmly believes in civil unions” and that the government cannot abridge the rights of individuals. “This is not for me a religious issue; this is an issue of civil rights,” Caravati said. Caravati said about 50 people were present for the debates. Roughly 13 spoke in favor of the resolution while three urged the council to reject the measure.
JOE CREA



 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2008 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy