 |
 |
| Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay & Lesbian
Task Force, said that despite losses in 11 states, gay activists are still on
the ‘marriage offensive’ in other states.
|
|
|
| |  |
|
Voters in 11 states faced proposals to add gay marriage
bans to their state constitutions. The measures all passed overwhelmingly.
Arkansas: 75 to 25 percent
Georgia: 77 to 23 percent
Kentucky: 75 to 25 percent
Michigan: 59 to 41 percent
Mississippi: 86 to14 percent
Montana: 66 to 34 percent
North Dakota: 73 to 27 percent
Ohio: 62 to 38 percent
Oklahoma: 76 to 24 percent
Oregon: 56 to 44 percent
Utah: 66 to 34 percent
|
|
|  |
|  |
|
|
| |  |
HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS
By: DYANA BAGBY
COMMENTS
ATLANTA — Gay marriage bans proposed in 11
states all passed easily Tuesday, bringing the number of states that constitutionally
banned same-sex unions this year to 13.
Four other states — Alaska, Hawaii, Nebraska and Nevada — previously
approved gay marriage bans. Voters in Louisiana and Missouri approved constitutional
amendments opposing same-sex unions earlier this year.
The clean sweep of the proposals Nov. 2 dealt a blow to the gay civil rights
movement, pundits said, and may have contributed to President Bush winning Ohio
— and a second term.
“It looks like in Ohio, moral values was the No. 1 issue on people’s
minds, which was somewhat surprising,” said Daniel Smith, a University
of Florida political scientist who studies voter initiatives. “Among Bush
supporters, moral values even trumped terrorism. And I think [the ballot measure]
did definitely have a mobilizing effect.”
But representatives of national gay organizations said Wednesday that despite
the losses, the campaigns fighting the marriage bans mobilized forces across
the country to face future anti-gay legislative proposals.
“One of the primary reasons the amendments were unleashed upon us was
to energize the far right, but this didn’t work,” Matt Foreman,
executive director of the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force, said Wednesday
during a telephone briefing with reporters.
“We think the data show a failed strategy,” he said.
Supporters of the measures, though, said the overwhelming support for the gay
marriage bans is the beginning of a powerful movement.
“This is just the beginning of a revolution for people of faith and conservatives,”
said Phil Burress, president of the Ohio-based Citizens for Community Values.
“Mr. Kerry can blame his Massachusetts Supreme Court for his loss because
we started campaigning the day after they passed the law [giving marriage rights
to gay couples].”
Results in the 11 states that voted on constitutional same-sex marriage bans
Tuesday — Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana,
North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah — weren’t even close.
In Oregon, where the strongest chance existed to defeat the ballot initiative,
voters supported a gay marriage ban by 56 to 44 percent.
In Ohio, where the Republican governor and both GOP U.S. senators opposed the
ballot measure as bad for the state’s economy, the measure passed by a
62 to 38 percent margin.
Some political pundits on Wednesday pointed to Ohio’s gay marriage ban
as tilting the hotly contested state in favor of President Bush. A win in Ohio
helped propel Bush to a second term.
“Issue 1 made the difference in Ohio,” Burress said of the marriage
ban. “We have an incredible army now that just woke up that will work
to further the cause of family values and take the country back and shut down
these activist judges.”
The ballot measures also helped turn out evangelical Christian voters, Smith
said.
“They did have a high voter saliency and they did help to bring understanding
of the candidates,” Smith said. “Was it orchestrated by the Republican
Party? No. But it was certainly condoned. It was not a coincidence they were
on the ballots of these 11 states.”
In Oregon, where gay rights activists felt they had the best chance of defeating
the same-sex marriage ban, rural pro-amendment voters turned out to help pass
the measure by 937,509 votes, or 56 percent, to 727,807 votes, or 44 percent,
according to unofficial results from the secretary of state.
Foreman said much of the campaign’s funds and resources were used in
Multnomah County, which includes Portland. Voters in the city defeated the measure
by 328,271 votes, or 62.5 percent, to 122,815 votes, or 37 percent. But in rural
Deschutes County, for example, the measure easily passed 40,893 votes, or 61
percent, to 25,639 votes, or 38.5 percent.
Opponents of the Oregon measure spent about $2.8 million, significantly more
than in the other 10 states facing similar measures. Supporters raised about
$2.3 million, though Foreman said that figure did not include money raised through
supportive churches.
“We had somewhat close to the resources needed, but did not have anything
close to the competition’s resources. In reality, we were outspent in
Oregon,” Foreman said.
NGLTF contributed more than $900,000 to the fight in Oregon, including $799,000
in cash, the use of 12 staff members and recruiting 70 other campaign veterans
...
|