PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2008 
  Please login or create a new account  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 BUSINESS
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 CALENDARS
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 CALENDARS
 2008 PRIDE GUIDE
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION













EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
JOE CREA





Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article






 
 

MORE NATIONAL

Majority of Californians oppose Proposition 8: poll
Adoption, marriage amendments rile gay DNC delegates

Del Martin remembered as ‘a real hero’
Lesbian activist lauded for her life’s work advancing gay rights

Obama speech an ‘emotional moment’ for gay leaders
84,000 cheer for Dem nominee during historic address

DNC’s Stafford talks about need to elect Obama
LGBT caucus chair cites Supreme Court as major concern

Log Cabin endorses McCain
Decision comes despite anti-gay language in Republican platform

‘Inclusive’ or divisive?
Palin praised by Log Cabin, denounced by gay Democrats

National news in brief
Gay Iowa couple celebrates first wedding anniversary


NATIONAL

Experts fault Log Cabin lawsuit
Unnamed plaintiffs complicate ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ case

JOE CREA
Friday, December 24, 2004

A lawsuit brought by the Log Cabin Republicans challenging the military’s ban on gay service members is the subject of criticism by legal experts who assert that a lack of a specific injured party and the hostile location in which the lawsuit was filed complicate its chances for success.

The Log Cabin suit is being brought on behalf of members of the gay Republican group who are currently serving in the military.

Another suit challenging the U.S. military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy was brought earlier this month by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network on behalf of 12 gay men and women expelled from the military under the gay ban.

While previous lawsuits challenging the military’s policy have upheld the ban put in place by the Clinton administration and Congress, those decisions were issued before last year’s historic Supreme Court finding in Lawrence vs. Texas, which struck down state sodomy laws, and a related decision earlier this month striking the sodomy ban from the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The SLDN plaintiffs, all of whom the agency says served in one capacity or another in the war against terrorism, are challenging the 11-year-old ban and seeking re-instatement to the U.S. armed forces.

Experts suggest that a lack of identifiable plaintiffs in the Log Cabin suit poses a major problem.

“When you bring a lawsuit, you need to be the right plaintiff to bring the lawsuit, and you need to show that you’ve been directly affected by the law you are challenging,” said Tobias Barrington Wolff, a law professor at the University of California, Davis, who consulted with SLDN before the group filed its lawsuit.

“LCR must demonstrate it is an important plaintiff. It needs to convince the courts that it is appropriate to allow them to prosecute this claim. The court might simply say, ‘You are not the right plaintiff; go back and find an individual soldier.’”

Diane Mazur a professor of law at the University of Florida, said that lawsuits in general, like the SLDN suit, are greatly strengthened by having identifiable plaintiffs.

“You are always more persuasive when you have people in front of you,” Mazur said. “Here are people [in the SLDN lawsuit] who are no different from any other member of the volunteer force, and yet we are telling them they can’t serve. One of the reasons Lawrence was decided the way it was is because the case had real people who were arrested.”


Log Cabin dismisses criticisms
Log Cabin Republicans attorney Martin Meekins, whose Los Angeles law firm White & Case filed the suit in October, dismissed such criticisms, noting that the Log Cabin plaintiffs do exist but are not willing to leave the military before bringing suit. He added that critics of the Log Cabin suit “have some sort of interest” in criticizing their case.

“These are the same people who are not very happy that our client has taken a leadership role on an issue that is clearly important to Log Cabin Republicans,” Meekins said. “Our client has done a great thing. For those who want to denigrate their efforts, … I can’t speak to that. I think that people who wish to say these things are clearly false. It’s unfortunate because we should all be so lucky to have two good law firms leading two great cases.”

Another legal hurdle for Log Cabin concerns the jurisdiction in which the suit was filed, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Bridget J. Wilson, an attorney at Rosenstein, Wilson & Dean in San Diego, who has done military law work, said that the Ninth Circuit prior to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” has issued a string of “highly technical decisions made with regard to a single individual granting very little protections to gay people as a class.”

In rulings prior to Lawrence vs. Texas, that circuit has upheld “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” While the Ninth Circuit rulings upholding “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” were wrong, getting a court to reverse its previous ruling will be difficult, Wolff said.

In the worst case scenario, Wolff said, the Ninth Circuit rules in favor of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and narrowly defines Lawrence vs. Texas in respect to military justice for gays and lesbians.

“One of the challenges that the LCR suit faces is that they are asking a court to reverse their original decision with the primary argument they have offered is Lawrence vs. Texas,” Wolff said.

“The danger is that if the Ninth Circuit disagrees that Lawrence has changed things, it’s hard to predict how broadly it will reach in placing restrictions on Lawrence at a time when we ought to be focusing on implementing the broad implications of the Lawrence decision.”


Will court reverse itself?
Mark Agrast, senior vice president for domestic policy at the Center for American Progress and a longtime congressional staffer who worked on military issues, said that while Log Cabin has “the heavier burden” of the two lawsuits, it is not unusual for a court to reverse its previous rulings especially after a new Supreme Court ruling like Lawrence vs. Texas.

“For a court to say we are now going to follow precedent … I don’t think it would involve much back-tracking humiliation for the Ninth Circuit to reconsider in light of the Supreme Court ruling,” Agrast said.

Patrick Guerriero, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, defended the suit, arguing that any court case brought by a group is going to be scrutinized by experts.

“We will offer legal support, amicus briefs for SLDN,” Guerriero said. “We are committed to seeing the end of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ through our case or SLDN’s. The notion that people have time to spend critiquing other cases … that time would be best spent working on their cases. Our offices have been very disciplined not to engage in that.”

The SLDN lawsuit — Cook vs. Rumsfeld — challenges the prohibition on openly gay service members on privacy, due process, equal protection and free speech grounds.

Experts agree that the lawsuits are correct in challenging the military’s ban on privacy and equal protection grounds yet they say the First Amendment arguments are the weakest of the three.

“Courts are always going to be more likely to consider that the military environment can sometimes necessitate and put limitations on the way people speak,” Mazur said. “I think it is more difficult constitutionally of the military to restrict people for being who they are not what they say.”

Joe Crea can be reached at jcrea@washblade.com.

 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2008 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy