NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
A California appellate court ruled last week that Bernardo Heights Country Club in San Diego did not discriminate against a lesbian couple, Birgit Koebke and Kendall French, when it refused to grant them the same privileges given to heterosexual married couples. (Photo by AP)
 
 
MORE INFO
MORE INFO
Druid Hills Golf Club
740 Clifton Road NE
Atlanta, GA 30307
404-377-1766
www.druidhillsgolfclub.com

Bernardo Heights Country Club
16066 Bernardo Heights Pkwy.
San Diego, CA 92128
858-487-3440
www.bhcc.net

MOST VIEWED
 
Gay members want golf club benefits
Battles at two golf clubs focus on spousal benefits for gay members

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Mar 19, 2004  |  By: RYAN LEE  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

Georgia prohibit same-sex marriage. Courts are likely to rule that local ordinances cannot supercede the intent of state law, according to Aaron Larson, a Michigan attorney and family law expert.

“If the state law says gay marriage is illegal, then for a municipality to decide to overrule that on its own, that action would be deemed invalid,” Larson said. “And there is not yet any ruling in any state that says domestic partners have the same rights as married spouses.”

The controversies in California and Georgia are the latest example of how country clubs often straddle a line separating public from private, and equal opportunity from freedom of association, said Andrew Fortin, vice president of legal and government relations for the National Club Association.

“The bottom line issue is that under the Constitution, people are free to associate without excessive government interference,” Fortin said. “At what point does the government have the right to tell you what to do?”

Since country clubs function primarily as social venues — not places of business — the relationships between members should be viewed as familial, and thus free from government regulation, Fortin said.

Lynn Hogue, executive director of the Southeastern Legal Foundation, a conservative legal think tank in Atlanta, said Atlanta’s non-discrimination ordinance provides too much government encroachment into private affairs.

“What the city is doing is a reckless extension of their regulatory authority,” Hogue said. “You can’t use the power of government to rewrite the rules of membership for a private club.”

But since the club sells food and liquor — including to non-members — it should be considered a place of public accommodation and subject to Atlanta’s non-discrimination ordinance, Kyser said.

“I think most people forget about the public accommodation aspect of this issue and don’t realize the club is making a considerable amount of money by selling liquor,” Kyser said.

On Wednesday, a bill that would have prevented local governments from passing laws that impact the membership policies of private clubs died in the Georgia General Assembly.

Clubs across the country have begun to examine and clar

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!