 |
 |
| Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) lost some gay
neighborhoods in his district following redistricting
completed after the 2000 census. Foley said through his deputy chief of staff
this week that he opposes a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution to ban
gay marriage.
|
|
|
| |  |
|  |
|
|
| |  |
HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS
By: LOU CHIBBARO JR. COMMENTS
One week after his communications director said he would not disclose his position
on a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, U.S. Rep. Mark Foley
(R-Fla.) said through a high level assistant this week that he now plans to vote
against such an amendment.
“He does not support it,” said Liz Nicholson, Foley’s deputy
chief of staff. “He has been troubled by it ever since it came up some
years ago,” Nicholson said. “Yes, he would vote against it.”
Nicholson’s statement of Foley’s position comes one week after
his communications director, Trey Ditto, told the Blade that Foley was “troubled” over
the proposed constitutional ban on gay marriage but would not disclose whether
he would vote for or against it until it reached the House floor.
“We don’t have any legislation before us,” Ditto said in
a March 22 phone interview. “We will cross that bridge when the legislation
is actually before us.”
Foley has received strong support over the years from gay Republicans, who
have praised him for co-sponsoring gay civil rights and hate crimes legislation.
Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.) introduced a proposed constitutional amendment
to ban gay marriage into the House earlier this year. Last week, Musgrave reintroduced
the Federal Marriage Amendment with a change in wording that she said would
clarify her intent to prevent it from barring state legislatures from approving
civil unions.
Asked why Foley believed the amendment isn’t already before the House,
Ditto did not respond directly, saying only, “We’re going to wait
until the legislation is before us.”
Added Ditto, “Once the final legislation to vote on is ready is when
we will look at this further. Until then, he is keeping his eye on it. He is
troubled by anything that has to do with opening up the Constitution.”
Nicholson, who said she has served on Foley’s staff for seven years,
said Ditto is “new on the job” and may not have had a full understanding
of Foley’s position on the issue. Ditto replaced Foley’s 10-year
veteran communications director Kirk Fordham, who left Foley’s staff
earlier this year to work on the Senate campaign of Republican Mel Martinez.
Martinez, who served as President Bush’s Secretary of Housing & Urban
Development, is running for the seat being vacated by retiring U.S. Senator
Bob Graham (D-Fla.). Martinez has said he supports the constitutional ban on
same-sex marriage introduced by Musgrave, known as the Federal Marriage Amendment.
According to Nicholson, Foley kept a low profile on the Musgrave amendment
because it appeared to be languishing in committee, with little support, for
more than a year.
“It got real quiet for a while,” said Nicholson. “After
San Francisco, people started pushing it again,” she said, referring
to San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s decision to issue marriage licenses
to same-sex couples.
“When it started to move, he said he could not support it,” Nicholson
said. “It was not the right thing to do.”
Foley is a co-sponsor of separate bills that would ban employment discrimination
against gays and give the federal government authority to prosecute anti-gay
hate crimes.
Foley later dropped out of the Senate race. His withdrawal came several months
after an alternative newspaper in West Palm Beach reported that Foley is gay.
Shortly after the Washington Blade reported the allegations in the West Palm
paper, Foley held a press conference with mainstream Florida newspapers announcing
that he would not answer questions regarding his sexual orientation. He has
denounced stories about his alleged homosexuality as the “revolting and
unforgivable” work of “rumor mongerers.”
But when Foley dropped out of the race, he cited his father’s illness,
rather than the gay issue, as his reason for withdrawing from the race. At
the time of his withdrawal, Foley had a substantial fund-raising lead over
his opponents.
A lobbying effort by members of the Broward Log Cabin Republicans may have
helped to persuade Foley to come out against the proposed amendment.
“You can be sure that Log Cabin has not been sitting on its hands about
this,” said Andy Eddy, Broward LCR board chair and director of communications. “Everyone
in Log Cabin has been approaching him and talking to him about this.”
Eddy said he thinks the personal appeals may have persuaded Foley to come
down off the fence on the constitutional amendment issue. “A lot of people
have to think this out, especially around election time,” Eddy said.
Michael Albetta, president of the Dolphin Democrats, a South Florida gay Democratic
club, compared Foley’s earlier silence on the marriage amendment to “prominent
Jews in the United States who remained ...
|