NOVEMBER 22, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Insiders claim that Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) has not altered his position on the Federal Marriage Amendment and will continue to push for its defeat should Republicans bring it up for a vote before the November election, even if it is altered to clearly allow states to enact civil unions.
 
 
MORE INFO
MORE INFO
Sen. Tom Daschle
509 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-2321
http://daschle.senate.gov
MOST VIEWED
 
Democrats disavow claim they might ‘cave’ on FMA
Claim by Task Force director creates stir on eve of hearings

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

May 14, 2004  |  By: LOU CHIBBARO JR.  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

has learned that backers of the FMA, including Hatch, were considering introducing wide variations in wording of an FMA in an effort to lure opponents into backing it.

“We saw this same blueprint played out in Massachusetts,” Jacques said. She noted that supporters of a state constitutional ban on gay marriage in that state added language to the proposed amendment that called for legalizing civil unions in the state. The civil unions clause succeeded in winning over several members of the state legislature, which was called to draft a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in the state.

The legislature passed the amendment, to the dismay of gay activists. Under state law, it must come before the legislature again next year before going to the voters in 2006 in order for it to become a part of the state constitution.

“That’s just what we don’t want to see happen in the U.S. Senate,” Jacques said. “To us, there is no moderate or acceptable language to an amendment to the Constitution” that bans same-sex marriage, she said.

Foreman said he became greatly concerned when he asked several Senate Democrats to issue a public statement saying they would vote against any and all versions of an FMA that may emerge on the Senate floor this year.

“We were not able to get such a statement,” he said, leading him to believe Senate Democrats were wavering on the issue.

But Trammell, who has worked as a campaign consultant to Senate Democrats in the past, said few senators are willing to issue a blanket statement for or against any legislation.

“That’s just not how the Senate works,” he said.

A spokesperson for Daschle did not return a call by press time.

Trammell and Jacques said Daschle has told them flatly that he will vote against any form of an FMA and will work hard to persuade his Democratic colleagues to defeat all forms of a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

“Daschle is from a state where 53 percent of the voters are Republican and only 37 percent are registered Democrats,” Trammell said. “Daschle is with us thick or thin,” Trammell said, even though Republicans have vowed to work for his defeat on the gay marriage issue. Daschle faces a tight re-election of his own this November.


Latino groups decry FMA
In other developments on the gay marriage front, a group of national Latino organ

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!