PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2008 
  Please login or create a new account  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
ELECTION '08
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 WORLD NEWS
 BUSINESS
VIEWPOINT
ENTERTAINMENT
CALENDARS
ECLIPSE
OUT IN DC
 OUT IN DC
 2008 PRIDE GUIDE
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION













EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


Virginia Gov. Mark Warner amended a civil unions bill to allow private contracts, but the General Assembly rejected the change by a veto-proof margin. (Photo by Steve Helber/AP)


MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
ADRIAN BRUNE


MORE INFO
MORE INFO
Equality Virginia
6 N. 6th Street, Suite 401
Richmond, VA 23219
804-643-4816
www.equalityvirginia.org





Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article


MORE LOCAL

D.C. clinic’s HIV case numbers surge
Whitman-Walker diagnoses up 232 percent from this time last year

Children of gay parents upset after O’Malley declines meeting
Md. governor cites ‘busy schedule,’ prompting criticism

Evans, Schwartz score highest GLAA ratings
Barry opposes same-sex marriage, but would vote to legalize it

Police log


LOCAL

Experts leery of new Va. anti-C.U. law
Ban on contracts between gay couples may be unconstitutional

ADRIAN BRUNE
Friday, May 07, 2004

RICHMOND, Va. — By adding the words “civil union” to its Defense of Marriage Act, Virginia joined the ranks of two other states officially and specifically banning the legal alternative to same-sex marriage.

But additional language in the Virginia legislation far surpassed even Texas and Nebraska — as well as the other 47 states — in the limitations it placed on legal recognition of same-sex couples, according to national advocacy groups.

The Marriage Affirmation Act, passed by the Virginia General Assembly late last month and set to become law in July, outlaws “any partnership contract or other arrangements that purport to provide the benefits of marriage,” in addition to prohibiting the state from recognizing civil unions.

Both gay rights advocates and independent legal scholars agreed the nation’s now most strongly worded anti-marriage statute could have considerable impact on the ability of same-sex couples to enter into legal agreements with each other.

“So much of this language was clearly not thought out in the way it could affect people,” said Carrie Evans, an attorney with the Human Rights Campaign. “The law won’t nullify contacts already drawn, or prevent people from entering into contracts, but it comes into play if two parties must go before a judge to have that contract enforced.”

Virginia Gov. Mark Warner (D), a graduate of Harvard Law School, was well aware of its legal implications, according to his staff, and on April 16 amended the affirmation act, introduced by conservative Del. Robert Marshall, to remove all the provisions dealing with partnership contracts. However, he kept sections of the measure that would restrict the recognition of civil unions from other jurisdictions — a measure Virginia gay groups accepted, though not happily.


No custodial agreements, medical directives
In a special, one-day session called to address those changes, among others Warner made to a total of 53 bills, lawmakers ignored the governor’s directive and passed the original version with a two-thirds, veto-proof majority in both the House and Senate.

The new law will abolish the rights of same-sex couples to execute a will, sign medical directives or craft custodial agreements, according to Dyana Mason of Equality Virginia.

But while acknowledging the damage to legal recognition for gay couples, Robert Lombardo, a professor of bioethics and law at the University of Virginia, said the law violates the “contract clause” in the U.S. Constitution, and would probably not withstand any legal test outside of its civil union ban.

Lombardo also argued that the law’s reach might be limited by other legislation more specific to the types of contracts gay couples might enter into.

“The usual rule judges follow in these instances is that laws with specific language usually overcome laws with more general language,” Lombardo said. “For example, the state’s advance medical directive says you can designate anyone you want to make medical decisions on your behalf, regardless of your relationship. That would clearly outweigh a law prohibiting a general contract between persons of the same-sex as long as it doesn’t specifically mirror a civil union.

“I wouldn’t want to predict how people would try to use this law. At least on its face, while it’s not good news, it doesn’t have the reach that it might.”


Joining C.U. ban
Before now, Nebraska and Texas were the only two states that have explicit language in their marriage codes referring to civil unions.

However, four additional states — Alaska, Florida, Ohio and West Virginia — use language in their DOMA laws that could be construed to mean civil unions or other legal relationships between same-sex couples, according to briefing documents used by Warner and obtained by the Washington Blade.

The Nebraska marriage statute, providing that the “uniting of two persons of the same sex in a civil union, domestic partnership, or other similar same-sex relationship shall not be valid or recognized,” was ratified by voters in 2000 and became part of the state constitution. Many legal scholars and litigation groups unsuccessfully cited constitutional concerns during debate over the measure and eventually challenged the amendment in federal court. That challenge is still pending.

Last year, Texas enacted a law stating that a marriage between persons of the same sex or a civil union runs counter to its public policy and is void. So far, the law remains unchallenged.

Out of the 39 states that have passed laws or constitutional amendments banning marriage between same-sex couples and recognition of these marriages from other jurisdictions, none before now expressly prohibited private contracts between same-sex couples. In fact, the recently passed Ohio marriage amendment, which many believed to be the broadest and most restrictive marriage law in the country, allows private contracts between persons of the same sex.


Warner walks fine line
Equality Virginia, and other gay groups, said Warner walked a fine law in amending the bill, not wanting to do anything to actively hurt gay families, but also not wanting to damage future political aspirations.

“He seems to be trying to connect all the dots, especially by invoking that discriminatory laws are bad for business,” Evans said. “It’s a neutral way for people to start thinking of what laws like these do for people who have choices about where to put their businesses in a competitive market.”

According to Ellen Qualls, the governor’s spokesperson, Warner believed his amendments keeping civil unions in place only reinforced the status quo in Virginia, since Virginia courts were unlikely to recognize civil unions from other states anyway, given the state’s DOMA law.

Lombardo agreed, saying that without the contractual provisions, Marshall’s bill would have been “redundant.”

With the legislative session effectively over for the year, the question over the legality of the Marriage Affirmation Act will now go to the courts. Equality Virginia, located next door to the Virginia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, is expected to announce a lawsuit by early summer.

“We were all between a rock and a hard place on this bill and Warner tried to make a really bad bill, less bad,” Evans said. “Hopefully we will get this thing stopped before it really does harm.”

The Virginia DOMA law and Marriage Affirmation Act might also be challenged under the U.S. Constitution’s “full faith and credit law,” which generally requires states to recognize legal documents like marriage licenses issued by other states.

Adrian Brune can be reached at abrune@washblade.com.

 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2008 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy