PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS  
TUESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2009
 
Please login or create a new account
  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 WORLD NEWS
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 CALENDARS
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION













EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


Del. Robert Marshall (R-Manassas) said he believes the law he authored to ban civil unions and private contracts between same-sex couples will withstand legal and legislative challenges.




MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
ADRIAN BRUNE


MORE INFO
MORE INFO
Del. Robert Marshall
General Assembly Building
P.O. Box 406
Richmond, VA 23218
804-698-1013





Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article




 

MORE LOCAL

Six D.C. gay clubs eligible for extended hours
Special exemption for bars, restaurants creates uncertainty

Killings, arrests dominate local news in 2008
Deaths of two gays, indictment of three others, capture headlines


LOCAL

ACLU to challenge Va. union ban
Marshall says gays are ‘unequals’ being treated ‘equally’

ADRIAN BRUNE
Friday, July 16, 2004

Less than a month after the enactment of the Marriage Affirmation Act, a Virginia law that prohibits recognition of civil unions or other marriage-like contracts between same-sex partners, the ACLU of Virginia has announced it will file a lawsuit challenging the measure.

But lawyers for the civil liberties group this week declined to reveal any details related to the suit, including the court in which it will be filed.

Some couples have already volunteered to participate in the suit, but representatives from the ACLU and allied groups are still combing the state for prospective plaintiffs in a quest to put the act’s constitutionality to the test, officials said.

“The more information we have, the better,” said Kent Willis, the executive director of the ACLU of Virginia. “Once we have a clear picture of who is being directly affected by the law, we will be able to make decisions about our actual approach.

“We probably can’t do this preemptively, that’s the problem. We don’t have to wait until someone voids a contract, but we should wait until some third party, like a doctor, refuses to implement a contract because of this law.”

Opponents assert the Marriage Affirmation Act could be used to void an array of contracts same-sex couples currently use to protect their rights, including medical care directives, wills, child care arrangements and joint ownership of property — all of which are legal arrangements the ACLU says fall under the rights provided by the U.S. Constitution.

The Virginia House of Delegates passed the measure by a veto-proof two-thirds majority last spring, and it became law July 1 without a signature from Gov. Mark Warner. The governor, a Democrat, favored the measure’s ban on recognition of civil unions but opposed the extra restriction on contracts.

Officials at Equality Virginia, a statewide gay rights group and party to the ACLU’s legal action, informed the governor’s office of the planned lawsuit last week and the possibility, though remote at this point, of Warner being named as a defendant for his role as the state’s chief executive.

Virginia Attorney General Jerry Kilgore said in a statement he is prepared to defend the law, asserting that it “provides a needed safeguard for the institution of marriage while not depriving any individual rights currently available to all citizens.”


Kilgore defends law
Kilgore also disputed an allegation from the advocacy groups that the language of the law could nullify contracts between heterosexual couples or business partners.

“The purpose of this legislation is not to prohibit business partnership agreements, medical directives, joint bank accounts, or any other rights or privileges not exclusive to the institution of marriage,” he said.

As it stands, the ACLU dispute could take on a variety of formats and work its way through the courts in several separate proceedings, depending on the number of state or private agencies already enforcing the law, according to Joseph Price, an attorney and Equality Virginia board member advising on the complaint.

Price said the gay rights groups, which include the New York-based Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, have identified two couples they say face legal harm from both a state and a private entity. But Lambda and the ACLU must first confirm that the two entities will enforce the law before moving forward, he noted.

Neither Price nor the ACLU would provide details about the couples’ circumstances and would only comment on general possibilities when asked about strategies for filing the lawsuit. They said the suit could target one particular state agency and include several couples; it could be a multi-pronged strategy, simultaneously blanketing the courts with a series of lawsuits against several institutions; or it could be filed in federal court or a Richmond circuit court depending on location and the efficacy of applicable laws.

“If the University of Virginia, for example, now said it would not provide graduate housing for same-sex couples because this new law doesn’t require it, we wouldn’t sue the state Department of Education. We would directly sue the university and President John J. Casteen,” Price said. “The law took effect July 1, and on July 12, I can sit here and tell you this type of broad implication from the law is already being felt.”

The organizations at one time considered asking for a declaratory judgment, in which a judge would provide an interpretative ruling on the law without an official complaint, but decided against it, thinking the strategy less authoritative, Price said.

“One of the two cases we have before us is very clear. The other [is] somewhat vague, but we will have some sort of definitive answer soon, possibly even by the end of the week,” Price said.

Dyana Mason, Equality Virginia’s executive director, said a recent statewide day of protest elicited a groundswell of support and reaffirmed many Virginians’ dedication to overturning the law. More than 3,000 people turned out in demonstrations across the state and the group’s Richmond office received numerous phone calls offering assistance from couples afterward, Mason said.

“More than 3,000 people are building around the idea of pursing a legal challenge,” Mason said. “People are compelled and mobilized in a way they have never been before, even if it may not be in their own best interest.”

Mason said Equality Virginia plans to embark on a grassroots educational campaign throughout the summer, and then start to pressure state legislators to begin chipping away at the anti-gay law in the fall, when they begin to devise their agenda for the 2005 session. But the affirmation act’s author, Del. Robert Marshall (R-Manassas) contends his bill will withstand any challenge, in the courts or the Virginia statehouse.

“Homosexuals do not need a special-status institution parallel to marriage like civil unions or domestic partnerships to ...

continued on next page


1  |  2

 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy