NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Republican Senators John Cornyn of Texas (left); Wayne Allard of Colorado (center) and Sam Brownback of Kansas were among the most vocal supporters of the Federal Marriage Amendment. Allard introduced the measure in the Senate. (Photo by Leigh H. Mosley)
 
 
MORE INFO
Federal Marriage Amendment
“Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution nor the Constitution of any State shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than a union of a man and a woman.”
MOST VIEWED
 
Senate rejects gay marriage ban
Vote seen as sharp rebuke to Bush

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Jul 16, 2004  |  By: LOU CHIBBARO JR.  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

modify or reject the current meaning of the “full faith and credit” provision.


Sen. trong>Wayne Allard (R-Colo.) called Wednesday’s vote not to move forward on the Federal Marriage Amendment ‘a good beginning.’ He, and others, have promised to keep pushing the measure. (Photo by Leigh H. Mosley)

Several senators, including Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), said legal recognition of same-sex marriage, once mandated by “runaway” courts, would destroy the institution of marriage and bring about the destruction of the American family.

Santorum criticized what he called an alliance of gay groups and their supporters for accusing backers of the FMA of being intolerant and bigoted.

“If you support a mother and a father for every child, you are a hater,” Santorum said. “If you believe men and women for 5,000 years have bonded together in marriage, you are a gay-basher,” he said.

“Marriage is hate. Marriage is a stain. Marriage is an evil thing. That is what we hear.”


Scandinavian evidence contested
Santorum, who was among the most impassioned of the Republican backers of the FMA, said studies show that legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the Netherlands and Scandinavian countries has led to a sharp decline in the number of people who marry there.

According to Santorum and Allard, the studies also show that the number of children born to unmarried parents also rose sharply in the Netherlands and Scandinavian nations following legal recognition of same-sex marriage or same-sex unions.

“Is this what is best for children?” he said. “Is this an argument of a hater?”

Although no senator sought to challenge the studies Santorum cited during the Senate debate, University of Massachusetts economics professor Lee Badgett pointed to a paper she prepared for the Council on Contemporary Families and the Institute for Gay & Lesbian Strategic Studies, which contradicts Santorum’s assertions.

“Heterosexual marriage rates in Denmark actually increased after adoption of same-sex marriage,” Badgett said in a July 14 statement. “They are now the highest they have been since the early 1970s,” she said. “In other countries that have adopted same-sex partnerships, marriage rates remained the same or increased slightly.”

Most of the Democratic senators who opposed the FMA during the Senate debate this week argued that the amendment was un

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!