HOME > VIEWPOINT > EDITORIAL
By: CHRIS CRAIN COMMENTS
 
continued...
And existing federal hate crime laws based on race and religion shouldn’t
have been passed until they could be amended to add protections based on gender,
handicapped status, sexual orientation and (of course) gender identity and
expression.
Transgendered people in opposite-sex relationships can marry under the existing
laws of many states. Should they be denied that freedom until same-sex couples
can do likewise? Should heterosexual couples be prevented from marrying until
same-sex couples can?
It would be wrong and immoral for us to expect others to be treated unfairly
until we are treated equally. And it is just as wrong and just as immoral for
transgendered people and their P.C. allies in gay rights groups to expect the
same.
HRC and these other groups say that trans-jacking ENDA will bring us together, “uniting
us as a community.” For most gay Americans, who live outside the Beltway
and the P.C. ether that permeates these activist organizations, holding our
civil rights hostage will have the opposite effect.
The only silver lining here is that HRC has proven itself — over many
years, countless black-tie dinners, and the christening of its glittering new
headquarters — incapable of passing even basic federal civil rights for
gays.
Perhaps ENDA will finally stand a chance when it’s controlled not by
HRC but by congressional sponsors, like Massachusetts Sen. Edward Kennedy,
who actually has a track record of getting things done.
| 
