PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2008 
  Please login or create a new account  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 BUSINESS
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 CALENDARS
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 CALENDARS
 2008 PRIDE GUIDE
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION













EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


Kecia Cunningham, a gay Decatur City Commissioner in Georgia, said the gay rights movement can learn from the civil rights movement, but that it is also easier ‘to discriminate against what you see’ when talking about differences between the two struggles. (Photo by R.O. Youngblood)


MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
DYANA BAGBY


MORE INFO
Editors’ note: This week, the Washington Blade begins a series examining similarities and differences between the African-American civil rights movement and the gay rights movement. Next week, a look at the role of the courts and public opinion in both.





Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article






 
 

MORE NATIONAL

Majority of Californians oppose Proposition 8: poll
Adoption, marriage amendments rile gay DNC delegates

Del Martin remembered as ‘a real hero’
Lesbian activist lauded for her life’s work advancing gay rights

Obama speech an ‘emotional moment’ for gay leaders
84,000 cheer for Dem nominee during historic address

DNC’s Stafford talks about need to elect Obama
LGBT caucus chair cites Supreme Court as major concern

Log Cabin endorses McCain
Decision comes despite anti-gay language in Republican platform

‘Inclusive’ or divisive?
Palin praised by Log Cabin, denounced by gay Democrats

National news in brief
Gay Iowa couple celebrates first wedding anniversary


NATIONAL

Pro-gay blacks a ‘disgrace’ to civil rights movement?
Comparing two movements draws ire of some

DYANA BAGBY - RYAN LEE
Friday, September 10, 2004

Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson remembers going to a movie theater in Alabama as a child and being forced to sit upstairs in the “colored” section.

“I was so hurt by that, I never went back,” said Peterson, founder of Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny, a Los Angeles-based religious non-profit that focuses on personal development for urban males.

To be judged by the color of his skin shook Peterson to his core, prompting him to join protests in front of city halls throughout Alabama, raising his voice to demand equal rights.

But today Peterson, 55, considers some former leaders of the civil rights movement — including Congressman John Lewis of Atlanta and Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther King Jr.’s widow — “a disgrace to blacks, whites and Jews who died [during that time].”

Watching icons of the civil rights struggle draw comparisons between black people’s fight for the right to vote, to attend integrated public schools and to sit at a lunch counter, and today’s gay rights movement, including the current push for same-sex marriage, fills Peterson with “disgust,” he said.

“There is [no comparison] at all. Homosexuality is not about love, civil rights, family — it’s about sex and nothing else,” Peterson said. “I’ve counseled men and women who have overcome their homosexuality. I’ve yet to see someone overcome being black.”

Joining Peterson and other African Americans who are offended by comparisons between the gay rights and civil rights movement are many white religious conservatives, including the Washington, D.C.-based Concerned Women for America.

In March, the CWA’s lead attorney, Jan LaRue, wrote a paper titled, “Homosexuals Hijack Civil Rights Bus: Claiming A ‘Civil Right’ to ‘Marry’ the Same Sex Demeans a Genuine Struggle for Liberty and Equality.”

Even some black gays are uneasy about too closely linking the two struggles for equality.

“These [movements] are similar to me, but many people in the gay community make the mistake of saying they’re the same,” said Pat Hussain, a self-described “pissed off black dyke from Georgia” who attended segregated schools in Atlanta during the 1950s.

“This comes from mostly white people — and they don’t have the concept of what racism is from the other side,” she said.

Decatur, Ga. City Commissioner Kecia Cunningham, the first and only openly gay African-American elected official in the Deep South, said the differences between the two movements can be explained with an example:

A white lesbian can walk into a restaurant, and her sexual orientation remains unknown to other patrons. But a black lesbian in that same restaurant can’t escape the color of her skin.

“It’s easier to discriminate against what you see,” Cunningham said.


‘Discrimination…is still discrimination’
Evan Wolfson, founder of New York-based Freedom to Marry and one of the leading voices in the fight for allowing same-sex couples to marry, agreed that there are important differences between the two movements, but said blacks and gays are both striving for dignity.

“Certainly the African-American experience in the United States is unparalleled in its violence, discrimination and indignity, so we shouldn’t make sloppy comparisons, nor can we say that our experience of discrimination is ‘the same,’” Wolfson said. “But that’s really asking the wrong question. No group’s experience with discrimination is the same as the others.

“What matters is the harm discrimination inflicts on the individuals affected, and on the society,” said Wolfson, who addresses the comparison between the two movements in his book, “Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality and Gay People’s Right to Marry.”

To suggest that gays are less entitled to rights and protection because they “choose” their behavior — as opposed to someone’s skin color or gender being “benign” — flies in the face of what this country was founded on, Wolfson argues in his book.

“Americans are as equally protected against discrimination based on race and sex as they are against discrimination based on religion. This is the case even though an individual’s religious belief is, of course, a matter of ‘choice,’” Wolfson wrote.

“Protection of choice and difference — in religion, in opinion, in identity, in expression and in intimate association — is the true moral vision of our American Constitution,” he wrote.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson and Leonard Pitts, two black heterosexual writers, also argue that there are essential similarities between the two movements.

“When any group of people is denied rights, whether it’s based on race, gender or sexual preference, that is wrong. Discrimination to me is still discrimination,” said Hutchinson, author of “The Assassination of the Black Male Image.”

Pitts, a Pultizer Prize-winning columnist for the Miami Herald who has discussed the comparison in his writing, said the civil rights struggles for gays and blacks haven’t played out the same way, “but in terms of striving for some freedoms, they are similar.”

“What we have are two groups of people who have been historically marginalized to a certain degree,” said Pitts, who is also the author of “Becoming Dad: Black Men and the Journey to Fatherhood.”


The role of religion
In the early days of American gay rights activism, the biggest obstacle preventing gays from obtaining legal equality and societal acceptance was the view among most psychiatrists that homosexuality was a sickness, said Jack Nichols, who co-founded two chapters of the Mattachine Society, a pioneering gay rights group.

“I really see the psychiatric viewpoint as having originated in religion,” Nichols said. “We knew we could get nowhere legally when people would be turning to the shrinks to get their opinions of us.

“And we knew in terms of society, the religious angle was one which required much more of a long-range approach, and as you can see it’s still going on,” Nichols said. “I think things are now worse in terms of religion than they were back then.”


Bayard Rustin was a gay civil rights worker and pacifist who organized the 1963 March on Washington where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his ‘I Have a Dream’ speech. But Rustin’s homosexuality often confined him to the margins of the civil rights movement. (Photo by AP)

Matt Coles, director of the ACLU’s Lesbian & Gay Rights Project, said when there is resistance against broadening civil rights protections to new groups, conservatives tend to focus on two themes: the group involved is unworthy — such as psychologically flawed — and that inequality is God’s law.

Traditional religious teachings and understandings have always been used against gay men and lesbians, but only in the past 15 years have churches transformed into political bases for opponents of gay rights, said Laura Montgomery Rutt, media coordinator for Soulforce, a group dedicated to ending anti-gay “spiritual violence.”

“I think the right wing — the James Dobsons and Jerry Falwells — first started creating a kind of fear-based movement based on misinformation about gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, and this movement has spread throughout the pews,” said Rutt, who is heterosexual.

“Now the churches are becoming more entrenched in their interpretation of Scripture that homosexuality is wrong,” Rutt said. “On the other hand, there are many denominations, religions and individual clergy who are becoming more and more convinced that their faith calls them to the gay rights movement.”

Rutt and others are also well aware that religion has often been used as a weapon against those who were fighting for equal rights, including blacks.

Using the Christian Bible to devalue black people and gay people is one of the most powerful tactics used by conservatives who want to deny rights, said Hussain, who said she remembers the fierce demonstrations in Atlanta streets in the 1960s and participating in a sit-in at a Krispy Kreme during the civil rights movement.

“I remember the signs that said ‘2-4-6-8 we don’t want to integrate’ and the discussions of about how immoral it was [to integrate],” Hussain said. “And I hear the same rhetoric now. When you demonize a group, then it’s OK to destroy it.”

Andrew Walsh, an assistant professor of religion and history at Trinity College in Connecticut, said that a New Orleans archbishop ex-communicated three Catholic politicians who supported integration during the civil rights movement.

Religion was invoked by opponents of civil rights, but not to the degree that communist allegations were used to discredit civil rights activists, Walsh said.

Mathew Staver, president of the Liberty Counsel, an Orlando, Fla.-based conservative legal group, pointed out that religion also played an important role in blacks’ attaining rights.

“Obviously there were some religious voices who opposed the civil rights movement, but I think by-and-large the civil rights movement was supported by religion more than it was opposed,” Staver said. “Martin Luther King was a religious and political leader, and he couched and viewed the entire movement from his religious world view.”

Rutt, from Soulforce, said gays must incorporate the moral language King used to plea for equality into their fight against discrimination, something they have been steadily doing in recent years.

“The secular gay rights groups are trying to bring religion into their messaging, but because of the amount of hostility — and rightfully so — that is still prevalent in GLBT people toward religion, it’s been really hard for those groups to bring about change to their organizations,” she said.

“Most of the people in America believe in God and many consider themselves religious or spiritual, so if you are not addressing that message, you would not be reaching the people,” Rutt said.

There is a wide gap between perceiving homosexuality as an abomination and seeing it as a natural way of life, but gays can make spiritual arguments on the immorality of discrimination, Walsh said.

“On the left, the argument is not about changing God’s word on homosexuality,” Walsh said. “The argument is that [religious people] will soon be persuaded to admit that your brother, or cousin, or sister is gay, and you don’t want them to live as second-class citizens.”


‘Height of ultimate irony’
For Mandy Carter, a black lesbian and executive director of the Durham N.C.-based Southerners on New Ground, raising the question of whether the gay rights movement and the civil rights movement are similar brings to the forefront a basic, but most important issue: When will blacks recognize there are gay people among them?

When African-American preachers and other black people criticize gay rights advocates comparing their movement to the struggle for black civil rights, Pitts suggested it is because most African-American men and women are historically conservative on such issues as gun control, abortion rights, even affirmative action.

And homophobia certainly plays into this train of thought, he said.

“People forget how conservative the African-American community really is,” Pitts said.

But a failure among blacks to recognize the similarities between themselves and gays being treated as second-class citizens is a disservice, said Hutchinson, author of “The Assassination of the Black Male Image.”

“If any group should appreciate, empathize and support the struggle of another group, it should be us,” he said.

The black civil rights movement also has a gay man to thank for one of its shining moments, said Carter, who is also a board member of the National Black Justice Coalition, a gay rights organization.

Black, gay pacifist Bayard Rustin was the architect for the historic 1963 March on Washington where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech.

Rustin was among those who introduced King to Ghandi’s philosophy of non-violence — the key ingredient to winning passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — and it was Rustin who was often marginalized within the civil rights movement because racist opponents threatened to use his sexual orientation to sabotage blacks’ efforts.

“What if Bayard Rustin hadn’t been there?” Carter asked. “There wouldn’t have been the civil rights movement we know today.”

To not see the similarities between the two movements is the “height of ultimate irony,” she said.

But it is sometimes easy for modern African Americans to adopt anti-gay attitudes, mainly because the black gay men and lesbians around them have not revealed their sexual orientation, or asserted their right to dignity, Carter said.

“In terms of movement for change, [black gays and lesbians] better be [involved] because we can’t afford to not be,” Carter said.

 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2008 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy