NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Diane Olson (left) and partner Robin Tyler (second from left) speak with their attorneys, Gloria Allred and John West, before a hearing on gay marriage. Tyler said this week she's concerned a 'unity statement' by gay groups is a retreat on marriage. (Photo by Jeff Chiu/AP)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
 
'Unity' statement seen as marriage retreat
Activists not on 'state of union' message see cover-up

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Jan 14, 2005  |  By: JOE CREA  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

see gay rights groups address.

Tyler said out of the 17,000 who voted in the non-scientific poll, the right to marry was the No. 3 on the list, receiving 64 percent support.

Stachelberg, speaking before other gay activists criticized HRC, urged skeptics not to read too much into the order of priorities, noting that marriage will continue to be a top priority.

"I think this is a list that we put together and the drafters set an order that in no way suggests the priority," Stachelberg said. "Marriage and securing marriage equality will continue to be a top priority not only for the Human Rights Campaign but for all of us together. We are absolutely committed to that goal."

Matt Foreman, executive director of the Task Force, said the document was clear that there will be no retreat from gay marriage, adding that one could say by placing marriage last on the priority list, it was being given special emphasis.

"Our movement does have many goals and many objectives and we all need to remember as we're caught up in the marriage moment and the marriage fights all across the country that we're still pursuing many other goals," Foreman said. "But no, there's no retreat from marriage. There can't be."


DOMA challenge?
Also discussed during the hour-long phone conversation was the future of legal challenges to the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

Matt Coles, director of the ACLU's Gay & Lesbian Civil Rights Project, said that if DOMA were to be challenged, lawyers would solely focus on the part of DOMA that denies gay citizens federal benefits.

Left unchallenged would be the portion of DOMA that allows states to refuse recognition to a same-sex marriage performed in another state, out of fear that the legal claim would be rejected, and even if successful might encourage passage of a federal amendment banning gay marriage.

Kevin Cathcart, executive director of Lambda Legal, admitted that legal groups would be in a stronger position to challenge DOMA if Massachusetts was not the only state to have legal gay marriage.

Larry J. Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, agreed that challenging DOMA at this time would be a strategic mistake.

"Politically, it is just not wise at all," Sabato said. "I understand the old argument that principle has to take precedent over politics but if you look at the lay of the political land many Democrats, rightly or wrongly, believe that one of the reasons they lost was because of the gay marriage amendments on the ballot. There is enormous squeamishness in the Democrat Party and the issue has emboldened the opposition in the Republican Party."

Stachelberg said that Democrats and Republicans HRC has spoken with are not blaming gay Americans for Election Day losses.

On Wednesday, one prominent senator, Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) told an audience at the National Press Club that he continues, "to strongly support civil marri

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!