Washington Blade
JULY 4, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Virginia State Senator Mark Obenshain introduced the Senate version of a bill that would ban access to certain types of Web sites from Virginia’s public libraries. Critics say the software used would not only ban pornographic sites, but also news and information sites. (AP by photo Mike Tripp/Daisy-News Record)
 
 
MORE INFO
MORE INFO
ACLU of Virginia
6 N. Sixth Street, Suite 400
Richmond, VA 23219
804-644-8080

Equality Virginia
804-643-4816
www.equalityvirginia.org

MOST VIEWED
National News:
Obama cheered at Pride event

National News:
Seven arrested in Texas gay bar

Local:
Va. court rules against dismissed gay employee

Local:
Marriage opponents lose case

National News:
White House protesters rally against ‘Don’t Ask’

 
Internet ‘filtering’ bill stalled in legislature
ACLU says measure could block gay sites on library computers

HOME > NEWS > LOCAL

Feb 04, 2005  |  By: LOU CHIBBARO JR.  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

A committee in the Virginia State Senate rejected by a tie vote a bill that would cut off state funds to public libraries unless they install software to block Web sites depicting subject matter defined as “obscene” under Virginia law.

Opponents of the bill, including the Virginia chapter of the ACLU, say so-called “filtering” software programs usually fail to block all Internet sites being targeted while they often succeed in blocking other sites that are not sexually oriented, such as gay or safer sex-related sites aimed at preventing the spread of AIDS.

Aimee Perron Seibert, the Virginia ACLU’s legislative director, said the Senate General Laws Committee could bring the bill in question, SB 882, back for a second vote under rules of the Virginia Legislature that pertain to tie votes in committee.

She said a member of the panel who abstained from voting when the bill came up on Jan. 19 could seek a second consideration of the bill. The second vote must come prior to a Feb. 8 deadline for all bills to be approved in the house in which they were first introduced. Bills that don’t pass by that date die and can’t be considered again until the next legislative session.

“We’re not certain what will happen to this one,” Seibert said.

A similar bill died in the legislature last year.


‘Crude’ technology?
Senator Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg) introduced this year’s version in conjunction with an identical bill introduced in the Virginia House of Delegates by Del. Samuel Nixon (R-Chesterfield).

At a Jan. 10 news conference, Nixon said his bill was aimed at protecting children from “stumbling” onto pornography sites while going online at their local public libraries, according to a report by the Associated Press.

He said the bill would make Virginia law consistent with an existing federal law that requires public libraries to install blocking devices on computers with Internet access as a condition for receiving federal funds, the AP said. Nixon noted that the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the use of “anti-pornography” Internet filters in public libraries, the AP reported.

Nixon held his news conference jointly with the Virginia Family Foundation, which disclosed plans to lobby the legislature for a state constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and same-sex civil unions, the AP reported.

Seibert said the ACLU is urging the General Laws Committee to kill the Internet filtering bill on grounds that it intrudes on the personal privacy of adults who use public libraries. She said the ACLU believes the decision on whether to install such filters should be left to individual libraries.

“To our knowledge, every court that has addressed this issue — including a federal district court in Virginia and the U.S. Supreme Court — has conceded that Internet blocking technologies are crude instruments that wipe out far more information than intended,” the Virginia ACLU stated in a Jan. 19 memorandum to the General Laws Committee.

The memo acknowledges that the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case U.S. vs. the American Library Association, upheld a federal law making federal funding for public libraries contingent upon their use of Internet filtering software. But the ACLU states in the memo that the court “only achieved a majority vote because the law contains a provision allowing libraries to turn off the blocking software for adults under certain conditions.”

Dyana Mason, executive director of the statewide gay group Equality Virginia, said the group has not taken a position on the Internet filtering bill because it doesn’t consider it a gay specific piece of legislation.

“We can’t take a position on all bills if they don’t directly affect the gay community,” Mason said.

Other gay groups have expressed strong opposition to Internet “filter” laws, saying they often force public libraries or other institutions to install software that blocks non-sexually oriented gay sites, including sites for gay youth groups. Organizations that deal with the AIDS epidemic have complained that filtering devices often block Web sites that offer HIV prevention messages, including advice on which sexual practices to avoid to curtail the spread of AIDS.

Lou Chibbaro Jr. can be reached at lchibbaro@washblade.com.



Spacer
email       password


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!