PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS  
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 7, 2009
 
Please login or create a new account
  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 WORLD NEWS
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 CALENDARS
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION













EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


President Bush must issue an executive order for the military to remove its laws against sodomy in an effort to avoid having the ban overturned by courts.




MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LOU CHIBBARO JR.





Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article




 

MORE NATIONAL

Joyous victories, stinging defeats marked 2008
Steps toward equality tempered by several state ballot defeats

2008: A year of change
From politics to protests, 2008 was unique

In memoriam
Notable deaths of 2008

National news in brief
Rick Warren: Not anti-gay to oppose gay marriage


NATIONAL

President must weigh in on military’s sodomy law
Bush must sign order to circumvent Lawrence ruling

LOU CHIBBARO JR.
Friday, April 29, 2005

President Bush must give final approval through an executive order to enable the Pentagon to preserve its policy of criminalizing consensual sodomy among military service members, according to attorneys familiar with military law.

The Department of Defense has been deliberating over whether its military sodomy law could be retained since 2003, when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down state sodomy laws on grounds that they infringe on the constitutional right of adult citizens to engage in private, consensual sex. The military has
claimed the law banning sodomy is its main justification for not allowing gay men and lesbians to serve openly.

Most legal experts have said the Supreme Court ruling, which was hailed by gay rights attorneys, applies equally to the military and the civilian population.

The DOD disclosed its strategy for retaining its sodomy prohibition in the wake of the Lawrence vs. Texas decision on April 7, when it sent Congress a proposed amendment to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the statute that contains the military’s sodomy law. The DOD also sent Congress a proposed change to its Manual for Courts-Martial, which has served as a set of regulations the DOD has used to implement various provisions in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, known as the UCMJ.

Gay activists initially praised the proposed changes after the New York Times reported last week that they called for removing the prohibition of consensual sodomy from the UCMJ. But a DOD spokesperson quickly contradicted the Times report, saying the DOD plans to retain consensual sodomy as a crime by moving it from one section of the UCMJ to another, and making it a regulatory offense in the court martial manual.

The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a gay litigation group, called the proposed changes a “shell game” that would not stand up to a legal challenge under the Lawrence decision. SLDN noted that at least two military appeals court rulings have cited the Lawrence decision, with one overturning a military sodomy conviction last December and another curtailing the military’s enforcement of its sodomy law in August 2004.

“Pentagon leaders cannot run and hide from the Constitution,” said Sharra Greer, SLDN’s director of policy and law.

In its proposed changes, the DOD calls for moving the sodomy prohibition from Article 125 of the UCMJ, which is considered a section of the military’s criminal law, to the UCMJ’s Article 134. Article 134, among other issues, addresses matters pertaining to conduct considered “prejudicial to good order and discipline” among service members.

Provisions under Article 134 are enforced through the DOD’s Manual for Courts-Martial. Changes to the manual are considered to be regulatory in nature and are not specifically part of the UCMJ. However, they must be put in place by the president, with the approval of Congress, the DOD told United Press International on Monday.

President Clinton issued two separate executive orders changing the DOD Manual for Courts-Martial in ways that supported gay rights. One of his changes created a provision to prosecute hate crimes. The other change prevented the military from investigating service members for being gay if information about their sexual orientation surfaced in a routine background check for a security clearance.

Tara Andringa, a spokesperson for Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the ranking minority member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said it is widely believed among Capitol Hill observers that Bush will agree to issue an executive order retaining the military’s sodomy prohibition.

Andringa noted that the DOD most likely sent its recommendations to Congress calling for the changes needed to preserve the military sodomy prohibition with the approval of the White House.

She said Levin, who has been a critic of some of the Bush administration’s military policies, has not yet commented on the proposal to retain the military’s sodomy prohibition.

A spokesperson for Senator John Warner (R-Va.), chair of the Armed Services panel, did not respond to a Blade inquiry by press time. Warner is considered one of the most influential members of Congress on military matters.

Gay rights attorneys believe the outcome of the military’s sodomy law is important because it has been cited by military leaders as a key reason for prohibiting gays from serving openly in the military under the Pentagon’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. That policy, which President Clinton proposed in 1993 and Congress enacted into law, holds that gays are unsuitable for military service, in part, because they engage in conduct deemed illegal under the UCMJ’s sodomy clause.

Attorneys for SLDN and the national gay group Log Cabin Republicans have filed separate lawsuits challenging the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy on a variety of grounds, including that the Lawrence decision makes the military’s laws against sodomy obsolete.


Virginia Senator John Warner, a Republican, heads the Armed Services Committee that will look at changes to the military laws on sodomy.

In December 2004, the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals ruled in a case known as United States vs. Bullock that a guilty plea by a soldier who admitted to engaging in consensual sodomy with an adult female in his private barracks quarters should be overturned. The Army appeals court cited the Lawrence decision and an August 2004 decision by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces known as the U.S. vs. Marcum.

The Marcum decision held that the Supreme Court’s Lawrence ruling restricted ...

continued on next page


1  |  2

 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy