PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS  
TUESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2009
 
Please login or create a new account
  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 WORLD NEWS
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 CALENDARS
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION













EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


Sen. Edward Kennedy




MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
LOU CHIBBARO JR.





Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article




 

MORE NATIONAL

Joyous victories, stinging defeats marked 2008
Steps toward equality tempered by several state ballot defeats

2008: A year of change
From politics to protests, 2008 was unique

In memoriam
Notable deaths of 2008

National news in brief
Rick Warren: Not anti-gay to oppose gay marriage


NATIONAL

House, Senate differ on hate crimes bill
Kennedy measure omits explicit transgender language

LOU CHIBBARO JR.
Friday, June 03, 2005

Ninety-six members of the House of Representatives have co-sponsored a bill authorizing the federal government to prosecute hate crimes based on a person’s sexual orientation and gender identity, a first-of-its-kind reference to transgendered persons in federal legislation.

But enthusiasm for the bill by transgender rights activists was dampened when Senators Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) introduced a Senate version of the bill on May 26 — the same day the House version was introduced — that includes a sexual orientation clause but omits the gender identity language.

“We argued this time for Senators Kennedy and Smith to add the more explicit language on transgendered people,” said Christopher Labonte, legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest gay political group.

“They believe their version covers the entire GLBT community,” Labonte said.

Labonte was referring to the view by Kennedy and Smith that hate crimes committed against transgendered persons are covered in the Kennedy-Smith bill under language authorizing federal intervention for hate crimes based on someone’s “actual or perceived” sexual orientation or gender.

HRC shared that view less than a year ago, when the national gay political group opposed adding transgender related language to both the hate crimes bill and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. HRC has since changed its position, saying it will no longer support ENDA if its congressional sponsors don’t add trans-inclusive language.

Transgender activists, led by the National Center for Transgender Equality, have said the explicit language of “gender identity” or “gender identity and expression” is needed in the hate crimes bill to insure judges and prosecutors understand that transgendered people are covered under the legislation.

Mara Keisling, the National Center for Transgender Equality’s executive director, said the more inclusive language would have an impact beyond the prosecution of hate crimes.

“We pass these laws not just because it’s an extra tool to prosecute crimes,” she said. “We do it because it educates law enforcement officials and potential assailants who may commit these crimes.”

Both the House and Senate versions of the legislation call for amending an existing federal anti-hate crimes statute that authorizes federal prosecution for hate crimes based on someone’s race, religion and ethnicity. The Kennedy-Smith bill adds sexual orientation, gender, and disability to the categories covered under the existing law. The House version adds the categories of sexual orientation, gender, disability and gender identity.

The lead co-sponsors of the House version are Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who is gay, Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.), who is a lesbian, and Reps. John Conyers (D-Mich), Christopher Shays (R-Conn.), and Illeana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.).
Gay Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.) also signed on as a co-sponsor.


Senate passed hate bill twice
As of late last week, when Congress recessed for the Memorial Day holiday, a total of 96 House members had signed on as co-sponsors for the House bill, H.R. 2662, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005. Of the 96 co-sponsors, 91 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.

Forty-three senators, including Kennedy and Smith, signed on as Senate co-sponsors of the Senate bill, the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of 2005, as of the time of the recess. Of that total, 38 are Democrats and five are Republicans.

Various versions of the Kennedy-Smith bill have been introduced in the Senate and House since the mid-1990s. The Senate on two occasions passed versions with sexual orientation language, the most recent last year. The House killed that version in a House-Senate conference committee, despite the fact that the full House voted 213-186 to instruct its conferees to support the addition.

Kennedy has not spoken publicly about his position on a gender identity clause in the hate crimes bills. Capitol Hill insiders have said Kennedy believes adding such a clause would hurt the bill’s chances of passing and would prompt several senators to withdraw their support for the legislation.

In the past, as many as 49 senators have signed on as co-sponsors of the Kennedy-Smith hate crimes bill, six more than the 43 co-sponsors so far this year. A few co-sponsors from last year, including former Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), lost their re-election bids to conservative Republicans hostile to gay rights.

Frank, while becoming one of the lead co-sponsors of the hate crimes bill in the House, which includes transgender language, has said he opposes adding transgender language to the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or ENDA.

ENDA calls for banning employment discrimination in the private sector based on sexual orientation. ENDA and previous versions of gay civil rights bills have languished in Congress since the 1970s. Frank has said adding a transgender clause to ENDA would result in fewer co-sponsors.

A transgender clause is more suited for a hate crimes bill, Frank has said, because hate crimes are threats against physical safety of citizens, including transgender people, and a legislative remedy would gain far more support in Congress.

Frank says ENDA remains doomed in the Republican-controlled Congress whether it includes a transgender clause. But he argues that adding such a clause could hurt the legislation’s chances of passing for years to come.

Transgender rights advocates, like Keisling, argue that ENDA backers should embrace a transgender clause as an educational tool to build gradual support for transgender rights at a time when everyone knows ENDA can’t pass.

ENDA backers in the House and Senate have yet to reintroduce the legislation this year. HRC has said it expects to line up supporters for a trans-inclusive version of ENDA later in the year. However, Kennedy — one of ENDA’s lead co-sponsors, is expected to introduce the bill without a transgender clause.



 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy