PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS FRIDAY, MAY 9, 2008 
  Please login or create a new account  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 WORLD NEWS
 POLICELOG
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 CALENDARS
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION






EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


Hayley Gorenberg says the curriculum her organization, Lambda Legal, is backing for Montgomery County Schools, will keep students there ‘safe and healthy.’ (Photo courtesy of lambdalegal.org)

MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
JULIE R. ENSZER


  del.icio.us       reddit  ?

Printer-friendly Version

E-Mail this story

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article


MORE LOCAL

Some CDC grant money unspent by Latino clinic
La Clinica blames staffing, facility hurdles for trans program delays

Male prostitutes, johns targeted in D.C. police sting
Official says non-commercial ‘cruising’ not prosecuted

D.C. Council considers hate crimes resolution

Stein Club to partner with Victory Fund for ANC training

Dem gay group raises money for Va. congressional race

Gay office at Univ. of Maryland spared cuts

Lawrence Webb wins historic election in Falls Church

advertisement

advertisement

LOCAL

Lambda Legal joins Maryland curriculum fight
Group to back Montgomery’s gay-inclusive sex ed plan

JULIE R. ENSZER
Friday, September 14, 2007

Lambda Legal is the newest defender of Montgomery County’s gay-inclusive sex education lesson plans.

The nation’s oldest gay legal organization last week joined a growing court battle on behalf of Metro D.C. PFLAG, which has long praised and supported the lessons.

Hayley Gorenberg, deputy legal director at Lambda Legal, said her team hopes to bring quick resolution to a dispute that began in 2005.

“It’s a strong curriculum,” she said. “It’s going to help keep every student in the school system safe and healthy.”

But an attorney representing curriculum opponents said the case is nowhere near finished.

“This is the kind of case that could go to the Supreme Court,” said John Garza of Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum. “It’s a big social issue.”

Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, Parents & Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays and Family Leader Network are challenging the Maryland State Board of Education’s decision to approve the lessons.

State officials said July 3 that legal challenges to the curriculum, raised by the three conservative groups, were unfounded and the curriculum is legal.

The lessons, titled “Respect for Differences in Human Sexuality,” explain concepts such as sexual identity and orientation using what supporters say is nonjudgmental language.

Montgomery County Public Schools students in grades eight and 10 are taught to recognize healthy relationships and to define human sexuality, gender identity and other terms.

Older students also examine topics such as coming out, and are asked to consider the challenges a transgender student might face. They also are taught how to use a condom. No special instructions are given to gay students.

Curriculum opponents have argued the lessons violate laws protecting free speech and religion.

In their decision, state officials acknowledged, “there may be disparate points of view on whether homosexuality or transgender issues are appropriately included in the curriculum,” but said they would “not second guess the appropriateness of the local board’s decision.”

The board’s vote did not deter curriculum opponents, whom last week requested a judge temporarily block district teachers from presenting the lessons.

In a 15-page motion, opponents say the curriculum wrongly teaches that sexual orientation is “innate,” shows “intolerance and hostility toward the ex-gay community,” and fails to note that gender identity disorder is listed as an illness in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Garza said the motion, which he filed jointly with the conservative Thomas More Law Center, could be ruled on within the next two to three weeks.

But curriculum supporters have argued the challenges are baseless. Gorenberg said the lessons are “based in the very best medical facts and science” available, and have been “exceedingly well vetted.”

Gorenberg also noted that students are not obligated to attend the lessons if their parents object.

“I do think that’s unfortunate, though, because I think all students are best served by learning all the facts,” she said. “An accurate curriculum in this area is going to help keep all students safe and healthy — and that’s regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.”

Gorenberg said Lambda Legal is committed to protecting the long-contested lessons, despite arriving to court more than two years after the first challenge was filed.

“This involved a lot of planning and discussions, and we take our involvement in lawsuits very seriously,” she said. “We don’t always jump in immediately.”

Garza, who described Lambda Legal as “one of the largest law firms in the world,” said he’s not intimidated by their participation.

“They’re very smart people,” he said. “But you know, just because you’re smart doesn’t mean you win on every case.”

Joshua Lynsen can be reached at jlynsen@washblade.com.

 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2008 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy