Washington Blade
JULY 4, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
‘Inaction won’t advance justice for anyone, and will just make it harder to pass any version of ENDA in 2009,’ said a spokesperson for Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.). (Photo by Lauren Victoria Burke/ABC News/AP)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
National News:
Obama cheered at Pride event

National News:
Seven arrested in Texas gay bar

Local:
Va. court rules against dismissed gay employee

National News:
White House protesters rally against ‘Don’t Ask’

Local:
Marriage opponents lose case

 
Kennedy favors ’08 Senate vote on ENDA
Leaked HRC memo suggests putting measure on hold until next yea

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Jan 04, 2008  |  By: LOU CHIBBARO J  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) is expected to push for a Senate vote in 2008 on the same gay-only version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act that the House of Representatives passed in 2007, a Kennedy spokesperson said this week.

Kennedy stated on the Senate floor on Nov. 8, one day after the House passed ENDA by a vote of 235 to 184, that he hoped the Senate would follow suit by passing the employment protection bill in the current Congress, which lasts through 2008.

But until this week, Kennedy’s office had not stated publicly where Kennedy stood on the demands by many gay and transgender organizations that Congress should withhold any action on ENDA unless it includes protection for transgender persons.

“Although Sen. Kennedy strongly supports protections against job discrimination for transgender workers, inaction won’t advance justice for anyone, and will just make it harder to pass any version of ENDA in 2009,” said Kennedy spokesperson Melissa Wagoner.

“We will most likely work to move the House-passed bill, rather than introducing a separate Senate bill,” Wagoner told the Blade by e-mail. “Because the same legislation must pass both the House and Senate, now that the House has acted, the only realistic way to get a bill to the president’s desk this Congress is to have the Senate pass the House bill.”

Asked if Kennedy thought ENDA could pass the Senate in an election year, Wagoner said, “Yes, if enough Republicans support the bill to give us a realistic chance of breaking a filibuster.”

Most political observers have predicted Republican senators opposing ENDA will stage a filibuster against the legislation, which requires 60 votes to break through a parliamentary move known as cloture. Kennedy and Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Ore.), who has joined Kennedy as a chief sponsor of ENDA, have said they were hopeful they could line up a bipartisan “super majority” of at least 60 senators to ensure the bill’s passage.

Jim Manley, a spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), said this week that Reid strongly supports ENDA and favors holding a Senate vote on the measure in 2008. Manley said Reid would defer to Kennedy on the “strategy and timing” of such a vote.

House Democratic leaders, led by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), said they favored a trans-inclusive version of ENDA but determined there were not enough votes to pass it. Rather than wait one or more years before being able to line up the support to pass a trans-inclusive bill, Pelosi, joined by gay Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chose to strip the bill of its transgender provision to enable it to pass in 2007.

Frank introduced a separate bill banning job discrimination against transgender persons and Pelosi vowed to schedule a vote on that bill when enough support could be found to pass it.

The statement this week by Kennedy’s office that Kennedy plans to back a gay-only version of ENDA comes after news surfaced last month that a high-level official at the Human Rights Campaign suggested a vote on ENDA would not take place until 2009.


Trans rights activists picketed the HRC National Dinner in October. Meredith Bacon, president of the board of the National Center for Transgender Equality, recently published a blog entry denouncing HRC for its handling of the ENDA-trans dispute. (Blade file photo by Henry Linser)

 

Holding off until ’09?

News of the HRC official’s comment came in a memo that was leaked to transgender blogger Marti Abernathey, who published it on her Transadvocate blog on Dec. 4.

The five-page internal memo, written by HRC national field director Marty Rouse, proposed that HRC adopt a series of actions and policy initiatives to “win back” the confidence of the transgender community. Rouse acknowledged in his memo that HRC lost the confidence of transgender leaders and that community’s rank-and-file members when HRC changed its position of unequivocally opposing a gay-only version of ENDA to one of “not opposing” such a measure.

HRC on Nov. 6 announced it would support the gay-only version after the influential Leadership Conference on Civil Rights came out in support of the gay-only measure. The Leadership Conference, considered the nation’s most respected civil rights organization, said it favored transgender protections but it, too, determined there weren’t enough votes to pass a trans-inclusive bill.

Rouse’s memo calls for HRC to redouble its efforts to build support for a trans-inclusive version of ENDA by providing logistical and financial support for transgender ...

Page 1 Page 2 continue reading


Spacer
email       password


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

reginanjus
0
Joe Solmonese's comments and reasoning are not correct! The statements in Atlanta and the actions taken, speak volumes about how we (Trans) are viewed by HRC! I is clear to us in the trenches that we (Trans) no longer wish to be associated with HRC. The same wrong statements about Us and the readiness of the people keep coming up! Look at just happened in New Jersey! Check www.GardenStateEquality.org

Posted 1/7/08 - 6:03 PM


jeri .
0
ENDA without transgender protection is akin to a civil rights bill that only protects the "light skinned" negroes. when is the GLBT community going to unite and demand an end to all discrimination? the T is here to stay, and we will NOT be excluded from anything. if the straight appearing/ straight acting gays don't want to include themselves in the GLBT movement, let them start their own. john wayne gacy would have loved it. maybe they can get senator craig to be their spokesperson.

Posted 1/5/08 - 11:47 AM


Dominick J.
Cloverdale, Ca
0
Hi all, just my 2 cents. NO Enda if there isn't the "T" to go along with it! We need to make this perfectly clear to Kennedy, the Congress and to the HRC!

Posted 1/5/08 - 1:25 AM


stephenclark
Washington, DC
0
No, xrk, the "loophole" claim is debunked propaganda that was put out by UnitedENDA. (See Dale Carpenter's posts on volohk.com.) Frank's bill is basically the same bill that the gay community has been seeking since 1974. It was only in the midst of the trans controversy that transfolks and their allies start trumping up this loophole claim to cynically try to convince gay laypeople to oppose a bill that would benefit them. It's equivalent to the claim that Saddam had WMDs.

Posted 1/5/08 - 1:06 AM


xrk9854
0
I disagree Tomron. The gay-only ENDA will be woefully uneffective. It is window dressing and resume fodder for member of Congress. The loopholes in it give employers methods to legally discriminate. 3685 is a bad bill. No if's, ands, or buts about it. The lawmakers know that (resume fodder) and are taking advantage of you. Don't blame the transgendered for pointing out the obvious flaws of this bill. They are trying to save your butt! Congress is the enemy, not the transgendered.

Posted 1/4/08 - 6:55 PM


tomron
Indio, Ca
0
Ms. Bacon's comments are exactly what is wrong with the LGB and yes T movement. Joe Solmonese's comments and reasoning are correct under the unfortunate circumstances. We cannot expect progress by loudly opposing those few allies we have in the Congress, and stirring up trouble for them. I am sure that Pelosi and Frank (and Solmonese and HRC) are frustrated and disappointed that the full ENDA could not be accomplished - so am I. But we take what we can get and move on to fight another day.

Posted 1/4/08 - 6:18 PM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!