NOVEMBER 22, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
D.C. Councilmember David Catania could introduce a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in the nation’s capital as soon as January. (Photo by Bob Bird/AP)
 
 
RELATED STORIES
E-mail claims Catania plans to introduce marriage bill in April


Best of Gay DC: People
Our readers and editors pick

Hearings, rallies set for D.C. marriage bill
Two hearings set for next week

Catania introduces D.C. marriage bill
Hearings set for later this month, final vote expected in December

 
MOST VIEWED
 
Catania may push marriage bill in Jan.
Some fear time isn’t right after Prop 8’s success

HOME > NEWS > LOCAL

Nov 14, 2008  |  By: LOU CHIBBARO JR  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

alliances with black churches and the black community on the grassroots level in their efforts to fight the measure.

Exit polls show that 69 percent of back voters supported Proposition 8.

“From the perspective of the black community, to blame us for what happened in California is not justified and is unfair,” Glymph said. “We need to be more effective and our leadership and public image needs to be more diverse here in D.C. if we are going to take on this fight.

“I’m not 100 percent sure that a referendum would fail here.”

Cheatam also said she believed an anti-gay marriage referendum in the District could win.

“The gay and lesbian community doesn’t have enough interface with the general population to ensure that we could defeat it,” she said.

Rosendall and other local gay leaders noted that Democrats won their majority in the House of Representatives by the election of mostly moderate- to conservative-leaning Democrats from swing districts.

The possibility of those Democrats joining conservative Republicans to vote to kill a D.C. gay marriage bill must be considered in deciding whether to move ahead with such legislation, activists have said.

A House Democratic aid, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders in the House and Senate would likely block an attempt by Republicans to overturn a D.C. marriage bill in a direct, up-or-down vote.

The aide said it would be more difficult, but still possible, to defeat an attempt to overturn a marriage bill through an amendment to an appropriations bill, a method Republicans have used to try to circumvent the Democratic majority.

Gay Democratic activist Michael Crawford, who serves as chair of D.C. for Marriage, a same-sex marriage advocacy group, said he also had doubts about moving ahead with a D.C. gay marriage bill in January.

Crawford, who also served as a local volunteer leader for the Obama campaign, said that although Republicans lost seats in the House and Senate in last week’s election, the mostly far-right Republicans remaining in Congress would likely use a D.C. gay marriage bill as a wedge issue to divert attention from Obama’s legislative initiatives on the economy or health care.

“Many of us are concerned that at least some Republicans would use a same-sex marriage bill coming from D.C. to inflict political damage on Obama, like they used gays in the military to go after President Clinton in his first year in office,” Crawford said.

“I think a smarter approach, or the next step for us would be to push for having same-sex marriages that<

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

rpcv84
Laurel, MD
0
With all the problems that DC faces, the Council should certainly be able to find something more important to work on. If not, then the Council members should find another job. Also, remember that 70% of the massive number of African American voters in California supported Prop 8. I think the gay community needs to do some "outreach" to the Black community on the issue of gay marriage. Which brings me to a question: Why is it that we gays in California protest vehemently outside Mormon churches and do NO protesting outside predominately Black churches? Strange.

Posted 11/14/08 - 8:51 PM


jeri .
0
i wonder what is more important than the dream of equality? not that the day to day issues lack urgency. marriage equality in the district will not be an end-all solution to inequity, but only another tiny step in the right direction. a step like forgetting about the color of the skin of our opponents, and focusing on the issues that separate our political philosophies. the mormon church is a specific target because that church made marriage equality a specific target, donating millions of dollars in a campaign with the sole intent to deny americans a basic human right.

Posted 11/15/08 - 10:05 AM


ReasonableDoubt
Washington, DC
0
rpcv84: Because the Mormon church were the ones to pour 25 million dollars into the Prop 8 fight, and not all of us are looking for a reason to attack the black community.

Posted 11/19/08 - 2:25 PM


rpcv84
Laurel, MD
0
ReasonableDoubt: P{olitical correctness run amok. The problem lies with the blacks, but most gays perceive that they need the blacks to further their agenda. Think again. The blacks are the ones who stabbed us in the backs.

Posted 11/19/08 - 7:22 PM


RCS
0
Another factor might be what happens in New York and New Jersey. If the legislatures of both of those states were to pass gay marriage into law, it might offset the recent losses in California, Arizona and Florida. That could provide an impetus for the passage of a same-sex marriage bill in Washington, DC.

Posted 11/20/08 - 3:58 AM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!