|
Rev. Irene Monroe is a Boston-based
freelance writer and can be reached at revimonroe@earthlink.net.
|
|
|  |
|
|
| |  |
|
|
| |  |
HOME > VIEWPOINT > OPINION
By: REV. IRENE MONROE
COMMENTS
I HAVE LEARNED as both a pastor and as a member belonging to several minority groups — African-American, women and lesbian — that a popular opinion on a civil rights issue does not always reflect the right choice.
Too often the right choice and the moral high ground on an issue derive from small struggling groups trying both to be seen and heard among the cacophony of dissenting voices and opposing votes. And it is through these groups that we see democracy working, where those relegated to the fringes of society can begin to sample what those in society take for granted as their inalienable right — like the right for all of its citizens to marry.
Earlier this month, we saw democracy work with the election of Barack Obama as our country’s first African-American president. But we also saw on the same day how democracy failed for LGBTQ citizens with the passing of Proposition 8, an amendment to the California Constitution eliminating marriage equality for same-sex couples.
While California’s gay community places blame on African Americans for the passing of Proposition 8, we were one of many interest groups backing the amendment. And although we are just 6.2 percent of the state’s overall population, we can’t wash our hands clean by saying other interest groups are just as culpable.
SEVEN OUT OF 10 of us pulled a lever to deny another minority group their civil rights. And while the pollsters and pundits say that religion was our reason, as African Americans, we have always discarded damning and damaging statements and scripture about us in the name of religion, such as biblical passages that either cursed all people of African ancestry (Genesis 9:18-27) or advocated slavery (Ephesians 6:5-8).
Many Prop 8 supporters voted yes believing the future traditional family was at stake. But when society narrowly defines marriage as solely the union between a man and a woman, it ignores the constant changing configuration of today’s family units. And the African-American community knows this best. While African-American ministers will argue for the traditional nuclear family, the stresses and strains of racism have thwarted that possibility. So we created our own family structures.
Therefore, multiple family structures presented by same-sex marriages should not pose a threat to the African-American community because they are what have sustained, saved and are still saving African-American families. A grandmother or an aunt and uncle — straight or gay — raising us in their loving home have anchored our families through the centuries. And these multiple family structures, which we have had to devise as a model of resistance and liberation, have always, by example, shown the rest of society what really constitutes family — its spiritual content and not its physical composition.
UNFORTUNATLEY, CIVIL RIGHTS struggles in this country have primarily been understood, reported on and advocated within the context of African-American struggles.
The present-day contentious debate between black and queer communities concerning what constitutes a legitimate civil- rights issue and which group owns the right to use the term is both fueled and ignored by systemic efforts by our government that deliberately pit both groups against each other rather than upholding the 13th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution that afford each of these marginal groups their inalienable rights.
While it is true that the white LGBTQ community needs to work on its racism, white privilege and single-issue platform that thwart all efforts for coalition building with both straight and queer communities of color, the African-American community needs to work on its homophobia.
The blame for the passing of Proposition 8 should not be placed on the shoulders of blacks, Latinos or even religion, but rather the blame should rightly be placed on the shoulders of our government.
To have framed our civil rights as a ballot question for a popular vote was both wrong-hearted and wrong-headed. If my enslaved ancestors had waited for their slaveholders to free them based on a ballot vote, we wouldn’t be living in the America we know today. And Barack Obama would not be our president-elect.
|