NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Gay activists said President-elect Barack Obama dealt a ‘genuine blow to LGBT Americans’ when he invited Rev. Rick Warren, a Proposition 8 proponent, to give the invocation during the Jan. 20 inauguration. (Photo by Richard Vogel/AP)
 
 
MORE INFO
Lowery speaks out on Warren controversy

ATLANTA — Rev. Joseph Lowery refused this week to get involved in the controversy stemming from President-elect Barack Obama’s selection of evangelist Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration.

Lowery, who will give the inauguration’s benediction, is a noted civil-rights leader who supports civil unions for gay couples.
And in an interview Monday, he said that Obama is doing exactly what he said he would do: reach across the aisle to dialogue with people with differing opinions.

“I’m not getting into that,” Lowery said with a chuckle when asked about the controversy in an interview with Southern Voice, a sister paper of the Blade. “I’m the other preacher on the program. I’ll leave those who are upset to their calling.

“I would hope we would not create a distraction,” he added. “The president-elect promised he would reach across the divide and that is what he’s doing.”

Gay activists who supported Obama, including Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese, have called Warren’s participation in the inauguration a mistake.

Warren, the pastor of Saddleback Church in California, backed Proposition 8, which rescinded same-sex marriage rights in the state. He also has compared same-sex marriage to incest and pedophilia.

“I’m opposed to the redefinition of a 5,000-year definition of marriage,” he told BeliefNet. “I’m opposed to having a brother and sister be together and call that marriage. I’m opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that a marriage. I’m opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage.”

Lowery, 87, is a founder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and was the first to mention Coretta Scott King’s support for gay civil rights at her funeral in February 2006, telling the audience that she “frowned on homophobia.”

Lowery supports rights for gay couples, but has stopped short of endorsing same-sex marriage.

“Because of the deep-seeded roots concerning marriage — in our hearts and minds — for a man and woman, many people, including me, have concerns about the concept/term ‘marriage’ and experience a degree of cultural shock when faced with same-sex partners. Nevertheless, I am strongly opposed to propositions or amendments that put into law any discrimination against citizens because of sexual orientation.”

In his statement, Lowery also noted that, “In regard to the inauguration, I hate to see distractions that draw interest and concern from the heart of the occasion and the critical issues facing the new administration, i.e. the economy, war, health care, etc.”

And with a packed inauguration day lineup that includes Aretha Franklin and Yo Yo Ma, Lowery said in Monday’s interview that Warren’s invocation will likely not be that big of a deal.

“By the time Aretha sings, the poem is read,” he said, “people may have already forgotten what Warren said.”

                                         DYANA BAGBY

RELATED STORIES
Choosing Rick Warren was smart politics
Obama’s decision elevates a voice that de-emphasizes condemnation of homosexuality.

Warren speaks of justice for all
No mention of marriage, gays made during invocation

National news in brief
Rick Warren: Not anti-gay to oppose gay marriage

 
MOST VIEWED
 
Early disappointment in Obama
Many angry over Warren invocation, lack of gays in Cabinet

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Dec 26, 2008  |  By: CHRIS JOHNSON  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

Gay leaders are assailing President-elect Barack Obama for inviting a pastor who supported California’s ban on same-sex marriage to speak at his inaugural festivities and for filling his Cabinet without nominating any openly gay officials.

Obama last week announced that he had picked Rev. Rick Warren, pastor of the Saddleback Church in California and a strong proponent of Proposition 8, to give the invocation during the Jan. 20 inauguration. Later in the week, Obama announced the last of his Cabinet nominees, revealing that none of his department heads would be openly gay.

Following the revelation of Warren’s invite, several gay leaders responded by criticizing the man they helped elect.

In a Dec. 17 letter to Obama, Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, called the Warren invite a “genuine blow to LGBT Americans” and said it “tarnished the view” that gays have a seat at Obama’s table.

“Rev. Warren has often played the role of general in the cultural war waged against LGBT Americans, many of whom also share a strong tradition of religion and faith,” Solmonese said.
In a statement released the same day, Rea Carey, executive director of the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force, called Warren’s invite “a direct affront” to Obama’s campaign “theme of inclusivity.”

“This was a divisive choice, and clearly not one that will help our country come together and heal,” she said.

In a Dec. 18 statement, U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, the only out gay man serving in Congress, said he was “very disappointed” with Obama’s decision.

“Religious leaders obviously have every right to speak out in opposition to anti-discrimination measures, even in the degrading terms that Rev. Warren has used with regard to same-sex marriage,” Frank said. “But that does not confer upon them the right to a place of honor in the inauguration ceremony of a president whose stated commitment to LGBT rights won him the strong support of the great majority of those who support that cause.”

Following the Warren flap, Solmonese called on Obama to promptly take action on certain gay-related initiatives.

“The Presidential Inaugural Committee may not change their minds on Rev. Warren,” Solmonese said in a Dec. 19 statement, “but President-elect Obama can turn the corner on this controversy by officially committing to … a concrete plan for LGBT equality.”

Solmonese called the plan “HRC’s Blueprint for Positive Change.” It includes several initiatives:

• Issuing an executive order within the first 100 days of his administration to reaffirm protections for federal workers based on sexual orientation while expanding them to include gender identity.

• Working with Congress to enact hate crimes legislation within six months.

• Developing a plan within 100 days to begin the process of repealing the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, which prohibits openly gay people from serving in the military.

Solmonese also urged Obama to work with Congress to end unequal tax treatment of domestic partnership benefits and to enact an employment non-discrimination law that includes transgender protections, but HRC didn’t suggest a timeline to approve such legislation.

Obama, Warren defend invitation

Obama defended his decision to invite Warren to his inauguration during a Dec. 18 news conference by saying that it’s “no secret” that he is “a fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans.”

“What I’ve also said is that it is important for America to come together even though we may have disagreements on certain social issues,” he said. “What we have to do is create an atmosphere where we can disagree without being disagreeable, and then focus on those things that we hold in common as Americans.”

Obama noted that he was previously invited to speak at Warren’s church despite Warren’s “awareness that I held views entirely contrary to his when it came to gay and lesbian rights.”

But Frank said “it is irrelevant” that Warren invited Obama to speak at his church because Warren extended a similar invitation to Republican presidential nominee John McCain.

Warren, who declined a Blade interview request, also defended his invite from Obama in a speech at the Muslim Public Affairs Council’s annual convention in Long Beach, Calif., where he said he loves “gays and straights,” according to the Associated Press.

“Three years ago I took enormous heat for inviting Barack Obama to my church because some of his views don’t agree [with mine],” he said. “Now he’s invited me.”

In an interview Dec. 18 on Dateline NBC, Warren said he supported Proposition 8 in California, even though it may have caused a loss of faith in him, because “if that hadn’t passed, the pain it would have caused to far millions more … would ...

Page 1 Page 2 continue reading


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Guinea Pig
0
Mr. Wolfe, I suppose then that your idea of true "America" is Gays and Lesbians ONLY appointed to cabinet positions. The last time I checked the community acronym was GLBT inclusive of ALL the community, not just your elitist "Gay" leadership. Is this really about who Obama picked or is it really about how he bruised your gay male elitist egos (you know, the ones you all cover up with the terms "inclusion" and "come together").I'm completely sick of hearing about the "gay" only agenda.Quite frankly, you "leaders" are no better than the bigots you denounce and are a prime example of hypocrisy!

Posted 12/26/08 - 12:28 PM


Guinea Pig
0
Mr. Solmonese,why is it that HRC's "plan" is something that you think the rest of America should follow like gospel,just because YOU thought it up.You don't speak for everyone in the community Joe,and there is more than one way to bring about change here.In fact,I would argue that you are doing more harm than good right now in alienating Obama just because he didn't appoint any "gay" only leadership to his cabinet and thus bruising your and other "gay" male leaders egos. Perhaps you should focus instead on the corruption going on in your very own HRC organization,which is plentiful these days.

Posted 12/26/08 - 12:41 PM


equalityNOW
Washington, DC
0
In case you want to prank call the moron, Leroy Swailes, or egg his house... **********

Posted 12/26/08 - 2:39 PM


rpcv84
Laurel, MD
0
Who cares if there are gays in his cabinet. My only hope is that he made good decisions in his choices.

Posted 12/26/08 - 7:57 PM


Mr Chris
0
And African Americans in particular. Please don’t say there are no qualified ones. Clean up bigotry in our community and then lets go after Barack. I still wonder if this was Hillary Clinton would you all be acting as such NO!

Posted 12/27/08 - 7:11 AM


Mr Chris
0
Early Disappointment…SAY WHAT?????

Chris, Please tell me since when you’re DEMANDING he put gays in his cabinet? You never did before then again never has been a minority President either

How many minority Gays are on the Board of HRC

How many minority Gays are on the Board of GLAAD

How many minority Gays are on the Board of PFLAAG

And for that matter, How many minority Gays are on the Board of The Washington Blade

Posted 12/27/08 - 7:12 AM


USChoice
0
I'm reminded of two quotes that make me angry as hell ... "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" ... The Who; and from the fictional Brian Kinney, "There's only two kinds of straight people, the ones that hate you to your face and the ones that hate you behind your back." I for one have pretty much lost all respect for the so-called leaders of the gay community; "be gracious" "rise above it" they say, what a load of crap! Maybe it's time for the gay community to get angry and start burning some stuff down, that's what got everyone's attention over racism.

Posted 12/27/08 - 11:26 PM


stephenclark
Washington, DC
0
Mr. Chris, it is possible--in fact, necessary--to SIMULTANEOUSLY address BOTH lack of racial diversity in gay organizations AND ALSO lack of inclusion, so far, in the Obama Administration. You're setting up a false choice in order to deflect criticism from Obama. All you're doing is running interference for Obama by trying to change the subject to race. Obama is not immune from criticism because he is our first black president. All you do by making excuses for him is further empower him to ignore gay issues.

Posted 12/28/08 - 3:39 PM


Mr Chris
0
Stephen, Whom I love the "friendly" debating with. I must say this. I'm not setting up anything. Maybe what I am talking about is the HYPOCRISY from our community

All this demanding he put Gays in his cabinet...WHY should he? After there is one who is in the cabinet

And what Gay issues is he ignoring Stephen...Rick Warren? That is a complaint. And he hasn't taken office yet and all this early dissapointment and I'm not re-electing him and so on.

What is that all about? Once again would this happen like this if it was Hillary? I don't think so.

Posted 12/29/08 - 5:26 AM


stephenclark
Washington, DC
0
It is inconceivable to me that Hillary Clinton would have invited Warren, particularly given his ravings about abortion. But if she had, I have no idea--nor does anyone--how the gay groups would have responded. Would she, too, have sprung it on gay groups with no notice? Would she, too, have offered a string of insulting rationalizations for it? Would she, too, have held up Warren's thinly veiled pedophile-baiting as a model of civil discourse? Would she, too, have selected a cabinet with not a single openly gay member? Who knows? This is not about race; it is about sexual orientation.

Posted 12/29/08 - 1:24 PM


Mr Chris
0
Well then fine So what is up with DEMANDING he put more Gays in his cabinet?

Does he owe this community something. There is one in the cabinet already must it be a TOTALLY QUEER THING? And how do you think other groups will see this? This hostage manner is BOGUS and will only hurt the LGBT community. Say what you will.But there needs to be a better strategy than this. Going crazy before he gets in office to me is just out of control and folks can get mad and not vote or support him. They will only hurt themselves down the line

And then what? back to square one

Posted 12/30/08 - 10:26 AM


rpcv84
Laurel, MD
-1
Mr. Chris, I'm compelled to agree with you. WHO CARES if there is one or more gays in the cabinet? WHO CARES who gives the invocation? BHO, as much as I deplore admitting it, is admirably trying to be inclusive of ALL communities at this critical time in our Nation's history. Bottom line: Gays here in America should try living, as I did, in Morocco for 3 years; there you will see what it's like in other countries and you'll be MORE than pleased with the many advances/opportunities we have back home.

Posted 12/30/08 - 7:56 PM


ReasonableDoubt
Washington, DC
1
Quoterpcv84: Mr. Chris, I'm compelled to agree with you. WHO CARES if there is one or more gays in the cabinet? WHO CARES who gives the invocation? BHO, as much as I deplore admitting it, is admirably trying to be inclusive of ALL communities at this critical time in our Nation's history. Bottom line: Gays here in America should try living, as I did, in Morocco for 3 years; there you will see what it's like in other countries and you'll be MORE than pleased with the many advances/opportunities we have back home.

Yep, listen to trong>rpcv84.  You should be happy with the back of the bus.  No one is attacking you there, right?  No one trying to kill you?  Good, now stop demanding equal rights.  If you are not being beaten or hanged or imprisioned for who and what you are, that should be enough.

Posted 12/31/08 - 10:53 AM


rpcv84
Laurel, MD
0
ReasonableDoubt: You're exactly right. I couldn't have written it better. Apparently you've got a lot of lessons to learn...

Posted 12/31/08 - 1:29 PM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!