NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Reichen Lehmkuhl, a gay former Air Force captain and author of ‘Here’s What We’ll Say,’ a book about his experience in the U.S. Air Force Academy, denounced the findings of a recent survey that explored ways of boosting troop levels. (Photo by Peter Kramer/AP)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
 
Military brass oppose lifting gay ban to boost troop levels
Majority favors lowering educational standards

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Feb 29, 2008  |  By: CHRIS JOHNSON  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

Despite recruitment challenges plaguing the U.S. military, the majority of high-ranking military officers do not favor allowing gays to serve openly in the military as a means to increase troop numbers, according to a recent survey.

Conducted by the Center for a New American Security and released in the March/April edition of Foreign Policy, the survey found that only 22 percent of officers support eliminating “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” as a means to increase recruitment.

The Center gave the survey to 3,400 military officers with a rank of major or lieutenant commander and above — top brass in the U.S. military.

Retired Navy Capt. Joan Darrah, a former intelligence officer and lesbian, downplayed the results of the survey because it was given to officers of high rank who tend to be in an older demographic. She said this demographic “is absolutely out of touch” and has “no idea that the studies show [how many] gay people don’t re-enlist because they are tired of living under ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’”

Men made up 97 percent of responders for the survey; 72 percent of responders were at least 61 years of age.

Darrah said considering their age, it was actually “pretty good” if 22 percent of responders believe in allowing gays to serve openly.

When asked about other ways to increase recruitment, 78 percent favored trading citizenship to immigrants for service, 58 percent favored lowering education standards and 38 percent favored reinstating the draft. Seven percent favored the increased use of criminal and health waivers.

To demonstrate the recruitment problems the military has faced in recent years, Foreign Policy notes that last year the Army had a shortage of 3,000 captains and majors and that this deficit is expected to double by 2010.

Victor Maldonado, spokesperson for Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said the Center for a New American Security consulted older officers who tend to be “slightly more conservative than their younger peers.”

Maldonado also said the survey is “at odds with the positive data” on gays serving openly. He pointed to a May 2007 poll indicating that 79 percent of Americans believe that openly gay people should be allowed to serve in the military.

Darrah also took issue with how the Center gathered its information through a survey and not a poll. She said gathering information through a survey means “you send it out to a bunch of people and some people answer and some people don’t, so it’s totally unscientific.”

Reichen Lehmkuhl, a gay former Air Force captain and author of “Here’s What We’ll Say,” a book recounting his experience in the U.S. Air Force Academy, said the survey had “no-better-than deplorable” results. He said he does not believe the survey accurately reflects what officers think.

Lehmkuhl said he is involved in a study that is examining the views of 40 straight military officers and their views of gays in the military. The officers are almost unanimously for the integration of openly gay service members as long as sexual conduct is kept to the standards of professionalism, he said.

A gay active duty junior naval officer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said he believes that allowing gays to serve openly “is the right thing to do,” but added that he thinks that not enough gays are willing to serve to make a difference in recruitment.

“All the people that say, ‘Hey, let’s allow gays in the military,’ who wouldn’t serve in the military themselves and the type of people that do serve in the military don’t necessarily care that they serve openly or not,” he said.

The junior naval officer also said if he were given the survey, he would have answered that gays should be allowed to serve openly, but he would secretly think it would not “make an effective difference” in increasing recruitment.

Gary Gates, a research fellow at the law school at the University of California in Los Angeles, estimated in a 2005 study that 41,000 men would be available for service if the military lifted “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Gates said the number is based on the assumption that gay men would enlist in the military in the same proportion as straight men.

Gates estimates that about 14,500 gay men already serve in the military, or about 1.2 percent of men in active duty. Lesbians already serve in the military in a higher proportion than straight ...

Page 1 Page 2 continue reading


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!