NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
D.C. City Councilmember Jack Evans (D-Ward 2) co-sponsored last week's D.C. domestic partnership bill. Evans said the bill amounts to a 'de facto civil unions' law for the District. (Blade file photo by Henry Linser)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
 
D.C. Council expands DP law
39 new provisions bring city’s gay couples ‘close’ to marriage

HOME > NEWS > LOCAL

May 16, 2008  |  By: LOU CHIBBARO J  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

same-sex marriage because they believe Congress would immediately step in to overturn a same-sex marriage law. The groups have said they support same-sex marriage on principle but don’t think it’s possible in D.C. in the near future.


39 new DP benefits

Below is a description of the main provisions D.C. City Council approved for the city’s registered domestic partners.

D.C. Council Bill 17-135 (Omnibus Domestic Partnership Equality Amendment Act of 2008)

1. Amends General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975 to clarify that step relationships include relationships created by a domestic partnership registration.

2. Amends D.C. Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 to include a domestic partner in the definition of relative in the career and education services and to allow domestic partners to be included in employee’s health insurance, disability compensation and retirement.

3. Amends D.C. Retirement Reform Act to include domestic partners as parties in interest.

4. Amends Police Officers, Fire Fighters and Teachers Retirement Benefit Replace-ment Plan Act of 1998 to include domestic partners as parties in interest.

5. Amends D.C. Campaign Finance Reform and Conflict of Interest Act to include domestic partner in the definition of immediate family.

6. Amends D.C. Human Rights Act of 1977 to include domestic partner in the definition of family member.

7. Amends the Act for the Promotion of Anatomical Science to prevent the desecration of graves in the District of Columbia to grant domestic partners standing as related to the deceased to provide for funerals that would otherwise be held at public expense.

8. Amends the Boxing and Wrestling Commission Act of 1975 to preclude a commissioner from acting where it might affect the financial interest of his or her domestic partner.

9. Amends D.C. Health Occupations Revisions Act of 1985 to include domestic partner within the definition of household member.

10. Amends the Law to Legalize Lotteries, Daily Numbers, Games and Bingo and Raffles for Charitable Purposes in the District of Columbia to exclude domestic partners of certain persons from eligibility for prizes of providing supplies.

11. Amends the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Act of 1977 to exclude domestic partner privilege from testimony concerning the welfare of or the removal of parental rights of a neglected child.

12. Amends “An Act” to provide for the mandatory reporting by physicians and institutions in the District of Columbia of certain physical abuse of children to provide that the domestic partner privilege shall not be grounds for excluding evidence in neglect proceedings.

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

bob20008
0
There are a few factual errors in this article. The most glaring, in that 6 paragraphs are devoted to it, is the idea that DPs and CUs from other states are not recognized as DPs in DC. The Omnibus bill does exactly that. I can only imagine that the reporter didn't actually read the bill and just copied the "purpose" section at the beginning. 2. GLAA was not the lead advocate for the bill, but they did testify in favor of it. 3. The Congressional review period for this bill is 60 days, not 30 as usual. 4. There are 5, not 4, coutries that recgnize our marriages.

Posted 5/16/08 - 8:06 AM


stephenclark
Washington, DC
0
I share bob2008's confusion. The copy of the bill on the D.C. Council's website includes the following provision: "Relationships established in accordance with the laws of other jurisdictions that are substantially similar to domestic partnerships established by this act, as certified by the Mayor, shall be recognized as domestic partnerships in the District."

Posted 5/17/08 - 7:27 AM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!