NOVEMBER 22, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton this week lost the North Carolina primary by 14 points and only narrowly edged Sen. Barack Obama in Indiana. (Photo by Elise Amendola/AP)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
 
‘It’s over’
Experts say N.C., Indiana results spell end of Clinton campaign

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

May 09, 2008  |  By: JOSHUA LYNSEN  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

Kentucky or West Virginia primaries because “neither candidate has any interest in raising them at this point.”

“It doesn’t gain them anything at this point, neither candidate,” he said. “You know, gay issues mean a great deal to gay people, and have some support among the liberal voters, generally. But they’re touchy when you talk about the electorate at large. And I think the candidates would just rather not talk about them. That doesn’t mean they’re not committed, but I think the test of that commitment will be after their election, not the way they campaign.”

Gay issues also could be downplayed in primary discussions in Montana and South Dakota, the final states to vote in the primary process on June 3.

Linda Gryczan, director of Montana Human Rights Network’s equality project, said both campaigns could make the calculated decision that gay issues “aren’t the issues that are going to move the majority.”

And they’d be correct, she said, because more people care about gas prices.

“Where they are on the gas tax is more important to me,” said Gryczan, a lesbian. “Because transportation is a very important issue to me, and the price of gasoline is a very important issue to me.”

Todd Epp, chair of Equality South Dakota’s political action committee, agreed that voters generally are prioritizing other issues.

“GLBT issues have not been in the forefront of the South Dakota presidential primary,” said Epp, who is straight. “Agriculture, education, the economy, water projects, the war in Iraq and health care are the biggest issues in the state.”

Consequently, Epp and Gryczan said their organizations are focused more on swaying local races than on the presidential campaign.

“Locally,” Gryczan said, “it’s far more important that we maintain a Democratic Senate and that our local representatives and senators will be pro-equality voters.”



Excitement in Alabama

Although gay issues aren’t prominent in the remaining primary states, they did make headlines this week in Alabama.

State lawmakers approved Tuesday a bill to add crimes against people because of their sexual orientation to Alabama’s hate crime law.

“It is a very happy day to be gay in Alabama,” Danny Upton, executive director of Equality Alabama. “I’m just almost speechless. This is something that people told us could never happen.”

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

gaypastor
0
I'm a gay guy who's been closely following this race for months now and, just as closely, following the gay press, the HRC and The Advocate for any insight among our community leaders about who are choice is and why. I’ve been disappointed for months! I’ve come to my own decision and I’ve been a Hillary supporter since February. In short I think Hillary is more experienced and a stronger candidate against McCain. I also think the woman who is embodying the right of all women is more likely to pave the way for queer, gay and lesbian rights.

Posted 5/13/08 - 6:17 AM


gaypastor
0
I’m left asking: Why have we been so silent about our support for Hillary? Where are our leaders right now? Why are we now standing by and merely watching the first woman president slip pass us as if the anti-woman sentiments sure to follow (and have, in fact, been going on all along) won't possibly affect us too? We know that sexism (and its equally powerful bedmate, homophobia) is running rampant right now! Why aren't we asking why we've spent months listening to people accuse each other of using the 'race card' but little to no mention of the 'gender card?"

Posted 5/13/08 - 6:18 AM


stephenclark
Washington, DC
0
It's too bad, gaypastor, that Hillary threw away her moral authority on sexism when she dispatched surrogates to belittle her opponent's manhood (which was also racist), attack his supporters as "effete," and use gendered playground slurs like "sissy" and "pansy." After eight years of Bush's swaggering faux machismo, the last thing we need is a woman who acts like a masculinity-insecure overcompensating teenage bully. What's next, a presidential Camaro with chrome testicles and a rebel flag? No, thanks.

Posted 5/13/08 - 2:39 PM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!