NOVEMBER 8, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton this week lost the North Carolina primary by 14 points and only narrowly edged Sen. Barack Obama in Indiana. (Photo by Elise Amendola/AP)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
National News:
Parker heads to runoff in Houston mayoral race

National News:
Maine rejects marriage law

Editorial:
So much for loving thy neighbor

Local:
D.C. same-sex marriage supporters press case

National News:
Running into ‘a DOMA problem’ in health care reform

 
‘It’s over’
Experts say N.C., Indiana results spell end of Clinton campaign

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

May 09, 2008  |  By: JOSHUA LYNSEN  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version


Some gay political experts forecasted the end of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign this week after she faced several new setbacks.

“I think she’s at the end of her rope,” said Dan Pinello, a City University of New York government professor. “I really do. There’s nothing more she can do. It’s over.”

Experts said Clinton’s estimated 14-point loss to Sen. Barack Obama in the North Carolina primary was a massive blow to her campaign.

“I think it hurt her pretty badly,” said Hastings Wyman, editor of the Southern Political Report. “They gave it everything they had — the governor endorsing her. And she still lost big.”

Also problematic, Pinello said, was Clinton’s slim win in Indiana, where early returns showed she took 51 percent of the vote.

Pinello said Indiana, which allows Republicans to cast ballots in the Democratic primary, might have seen its results skewed by voters who acted on conservative talk radio suggestions to vote for Clinton in hopes of prolonging the Democratic contest.

“Therefore, I would call that a literal tie,” he said. “Not a virtual tie, but a literal tie.”

According to CNN tallies, Obama had 1,584 pledged delegates Wednesday to Clinton’s 1,415. Including superdelegates, Obama had 1,836 delegates to Clinton’s 1,681.

A candidate needs 2,025 delegates to win the Democratic nomination outright. About 220 pledged delegates remain to be won and 270 superdelegates are uncommitted.

Clinton’s delegate deficit follows news that she lent her financially strapped campaign more than $6 million over the last month.

“She still desperately needs money,” Pinello said, “and I’m not sure what kind of convincing pitch she can make to contributors.”

Wyman said although six state primaries remain on the calendar, the race has effectively ended.

“I think Obama is the nominee,” he said. “I think it’s a matter of Clinton finding a graceful way out. She’s done well, and she’s certainly made it a race, but she hasn’t done well enough.”

Also falling short this week was an openly gay U.S. Senate candidate in North Carolina.

Jim Neal lost his primary bid to run against Republican incumbent Sen. Elizabeth Dole.
Neal’s main opponent, veteran state Sen. Kay Hagan, took an estimated 60 percent of the vote to his 18 percent.

“In that Senate race, it’s very clear that Jim Neal’s being gay didn’t help him at all,” Wyman said. “It probably hurt him terribly. It was not an issue, but it was well known.”

Neal did not immediately respond Wednesday to the Blade’s calls for comment.

“I will say that even had he been straight, I think he would have lost,” Wyman said. “You know, he was not an office holder, as was his opponent, state Sen. Kay Hagan. I just think he could have done better.”

Although neither the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund nor the Human Rights Campaign endorsed Neal, Wyman said those were not fatal blows.

“It might have hurt his money,” he said, “but I don’t think those groups have a political force in North Carolina.”

Wyman said Neal was hurt more by his overly ambitious goals, and would have to recalibrate before mounting any future run for office.

“I would choose a smaller office, with a more gay-friendly electorate, something around Chapel Hill or maybe around Charlotte,” he said. “But with 18 percent, I don’t think he has a great political future.”

Presidential primary attention was shifting this week to Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, which hold primaries later this month.

But it’s unclear whether gay issues will figure into those votes. Jordan Palmer, president of the Kentucky Equality Federation, said gay issues generally haven’t been part of the campaign dialogue in his state.

“I’m not seeing a whole lot,” said Palmer, who is gay. “And it’s very disappointing.”

Palmer said the general silence on gay issues is particularly dispiriting because Kentucky “is one of the few places where there are no laws on the books to protect gay people from anything.”

He said although Lexington, the state’s largest city, bars discrimination based on sexual orientation in the areas of employment and housing, he would welcome any additional calls for equality a presidential candidate would make.

“But realistically, there’s not a whole lot a United States president can do in Kentucky,” Palmer said.

Wyman said gay issues were unlikely to figure into the ...

Page 1 Page 2 continue reading


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

gaypastor
0
I'm a gay guy who's been closely following this race for months now and, just as closely, following the gay press, the HRC and The Advocate for any insight among our community leaders about who are choice is and why. I’ve been disappointed for months! I’ve come to my own decision and I’ve been a Hillary supporter since February. In short I think Hillary is more experienced and a stronger candidate against McCain. I also think the woman who is embodying the right of all women is more likely to pave the way for queer, gay and lesbian rights.

Posted 5/13/08 - 6:17 AM


gaypastor
0
I’m left asking: Why have we been so silent about our support for Hillary? Where are our leaders right now? Why are we now standing by and merely watching the first woman president slip pass us as if the anti-woman sentiments sure to follow (and have, in fact, been going on all along) won't possibly affect us too? We know that sexism (and its equally powerful bedmate, homophobia) is running rampant right now! Why aren't we asking why we've spent months listening to people accuse each other of using the 'race card' but little to no mention of the 'gender card?"

Posted 5/13/08 - 6:18 AM


stephenclark
Washington, DC
0
It's too bad, gaypastor, that Hillary threw away her moral authority on sexism when she dispatched surrogates to belittle her opponent's manhood (which was also racist), attack his supporters as "effete," and use gendered playground slurs like "sissy" and "pansy." After eight years of Bush's swaggering faux machismo, the last thing we need is a woman who acts like a masculinity-insecure overcompensating teenage bully. What's next, a presidential Camaro with chrome testicles and a rebel flag? No, thanks.

Posted 5/13/08 - 2:39 PM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!