NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
MORE INFO
Kevin Naff is editor of the Washington Blade and can be reached at knaff@washblade.com.
MOST VIEWED
 
Eyes on two prizes
It’s time to put aside petty squabbles and defeat Calif. amendment, elect Obama president

HOME > VIEWPOINT > EDITORIAL

Jun 06, 2008  |  By: KEVIN NAFF  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

IF LAST WEEKEND’S Democratic National Committee meeting is any indication, Sen. Barack Obama has a long way to go in winning over Sen. Hillary Clinton’s supporters.

The sometimes-raucous meeting resolved the question of how to seat delegations from Michigan and Florida, which were penalized for moving up their primaries in defiance of party rules. The outcome was yet another defeat for Clinton, after she won only a fraction of the delegates she’d hoped for.

Things only got worse for Clinton from there. On Monday, Bill Clinton was back in the headlines after he denounced Vanity Fair reporter Todd Purdum in colorful language for penning a lengthy story he saw as a hit piece. To be sure, there were elements of Purdum’s story that were over the line, including references to Bill Clinton’s physical appearance and to unsubstantiated blogger accusations of extramarital affairs. Then there’s the matter of Purdum’s wife — former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers, making for an obvious conflict of interest in a story that includes multiple anonymous sources. Are we really supposed to believe that Myers wasn’t among them?

But in a style that is newly typical, Clinton overreacted and called Purdum a “scumbag,” not exactly behavior befitting a former president. His response helped to prove Purdum’s point — that Clinton is out of control these days.

As if things weren’t bad enough, Tuesday arrived and with it the news that more and more superdelegates were backing Obama. By early afternoon, the AP was already calling the nomination battle over and declaring Obama the victor, something the rest of us knew after Indiana, if not sooner.

Even after Montana and South Dakota voted and Obama’s victory became official Tuesday night, Clinton declined to concede. In stark contrast to Obama’s soaring and inspirational speech marking a historic first for the country — a major party nominating an African American for president — Clinton seemed determine to wield her “18 million” supporters as a weapon to presumably extract the No. 2 spot on Obama’s ticket. She insisted that we count all the votes — an ironic assertion given her campaign had no battle plan beyond Super Tuesday. But the votes were counted and she placed second.

In short, it wasn’t a good week for Hillary Clinton and certainly not the outcome she — and most of the rest of us — envisioned at the start of this protracted and sometimes exhilarating campaign. And so it’s time to turn to the general election and move past the divisive fight between Obama and Clinton loyalists.

FOR GAY VOTERS, the choice couldn’t be easier: the prospect of Sen. John McCain making appointments to the Supreme Court should be enough to send us all to the voting booth for Obama. McCain’s gay supporters like to point out that he opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment, but don’t forget that he opposes the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, expansion of the federal hate crimes bill and repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” And he supported his home state of Arizona’s effort to ban not only same-sex marriage, but civil unions and domestic partnerships, too.

One coy appearance on “Ellen” doesn’t wash away the stain of McCain’s anti-gay record. Despite his false claims of support for limited rights for gay couples made on the talk show, McCain has proven that his “straight talking” days are long over. If he can backtrack on his opposition to waterboarding, then voters can’t trust him on anything. 

But that’s not enough for some Hillary supporters. During last week’s DNC meeting, some could be heard chanting McCain’s name. Anecdotally, I’ve come across several gay Hillary supporters so unhappy with the outcome that they plan to either not vote or to back McCain.

This is simply sour grapes of the most self-destructive variety. Hillary’s supporters are understandably upset, but Obama — and the country — needs her 18 million or so votes in November. If securing those votes means Obama has to offer Hillary the vice president slot on the ticket, then so be it. But regardless, it’s critical to bring those voters and donors onboard.

McCain and the Republicans have been quiet — too quiet — in the wake of the California Supreme Court ruling and New York Gov. David Paterson’s decision to recognize out-of-state gay marriages. Don’t be fooled.

“There is no reason to think [gay marriage] ...

Page 1 Page 2 continue reading


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Mr Chris
0
All I can say about the Clinton supporters is this. It has been SUPERIORISM and EVILNESS at it's best. Like the woman said at the rules committee meeting "Barack Obama is an inadequate Man" Which leads me to believe that these White women and White Gay supporters feel that this she should have been entitled to this. And talk about “unity in the community”. The bottom line is this vote for McCain if you really don’t like Obama. Because he (Obama) has nothing to lose and all to gain. Us on the hand have a lot to LOSE we need to get over RACE if our community really wants EQUALITY!

Posted 6/10/08 - 4:05 AM


Jim S
Washington, DC
0
If you really want to defeat the anti-marriage amendment in California, gay people everywhere need to give money money money to one of the PACs or charities set up to defeat it. You can give online at: https://secure.ga3.org/03/ca_marriage_pac or https://secure.ga4.org/01/equalityforall or http://www.letcaliforniaring.org/site/c.ltJTJ6MQIuE/b.3411527/apps/nl/newsletter2.asp The first two are PACs. The third is a charity, so donations to it are tax deductible. These links should be plastered all over this website. Instead I see a banner ad for McCain's campaign?? Think.

Posted 6/11/08 - 5:39 PM


MilitantTrannie
0
It's unfortunate that anyone who works for the Blade has the audactiy to believe he can dictate my political agenda. C'mon Kevin Naff, get a grip. Gay marriage will never become an enduring right. The majority of gays are unfaithful to partners. Focus on what's necessary and obtainable. Hate crimes legislation and equal protections. Obama is trouble for America. He brings hatred to campaign 2008. Like you Mr Chris,your hatred of women is evident, see a therapist. You should question a vote for a man because of his skin color. That's prejudice.

Posted 6/13/08 - 2:22 AM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!