NOVEMBER 22, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Trans activist Jeri Hughes, seen here in a photo taken at this year’s Pride parade, said proposed changes to Washington’s Human Rights Act will lead to discrimination against transgender residents in jail. (Blade file photo by Henry Linser)
 
 
MOST VIEWED
 
Trans rule change raises concerns
Local activists say new jail proposal weakens rights act

HOME > NEWS > LOCAL

Jul 25, 2008  |  By: LOU CHIBBARO JR  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version



continued...

and Commission on Human Rights apparently heeded requests by the Department of Correction to propose rolling back non-discrimination protections for transgender prisoners.

Among the Commission’s members are Christopher Dyer, director of the Mayor’s Office of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Affairs; and gay D.C. residents Michael Ward and Thomas Fulton.

Mario Acosta-Velez, president of the Gertrude Stein Democratic Club, the city’s largest gay political group, served as acting chair of the commission until his term expired in early July. Although Acosta-Velez no longer serves on the commission, he was a member at the time that Alexis Taylor, general counsel of the Office of Human Rights, introduced the proposed changes to the commission.
Acosta-Velez said he appointed a subcommittee of the commission to consider the proposed changes but chose not to become a member because his term on the commission was ending.

“This is not saying in any way that the commission is agreeing to these proposals or that it favors cutting back on the Human Rights Act,” Acosta-Velez said. “We decided to let them go through the process and to seek out comments from the public. It was our understanding that the proposals would come back to the commission for a vote, and that’s when the matter would be decided.”

Ward echoed that sentiment, saying he has concerns over parts of the proposed rule changes.
“We all expected there would be some controversy,” he said. “That’s part of the reason for putting them out there for public comment.”

Dyer declined comment. As a member of the mayor’s staff, Dyer is likely to face competing pressures on the proposed rules, with gay and trans activists urging him to vote against them and the mayor potentially asking him to support them.

Mayoral spokesperson Dena Iverson said Wednesday that the mayor would take into consideration all public comments on the proposal before making a decision.

“We look forward to hearing back from the community,” she said.

Ward said Taylor of the Office of Human Rights informed the commission that the proposed rules came from the Fenty Administration, with the request that the commission consider them and possibly fine-tune the proposed changes after they go through the public comment period.

Although the rules changes are being officially proposed by the Office of Human Rights and the Commission, local gay and trans acti

Previous Page 1 Page 2


email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

bob20008
0
If they knew that it was coming and that there would be controversy, why didn't they contact any of the groups that testified on the rules in 2006? Why did we have to find it in the D.C. Register? All of the gay members of the Commission had ample time to notifiy advocacy groups, but failed to do so. Not even Mario who heads the Stein Club. Shameful.

Posted 7/25/08 - 8:44 AM


jeri .
0
The proposed rulemaking would actually PROMOTE discrimination against a minority population that is already marginalized from the discrimination and bigotry that exists within our society. Severe problems in the correctional setting are real - this proposed amendment will serve no purpose to correct those problems. Real concern, dialogue, and mediation will provide the best remedy. I urge you to oppose this amendment in writing to Ms. Taylor, and let the DC City Council know that you oppose any bill that detracts from the Human Rights Protections that we enjoy in the District.......If you don't fight for them, who will?

Posted 7/25/08 - 10:11 AM


ZoeB
0
bob20008 - Why? Because it's not a gay issue, is it? Why should they care? They'll come back for the T's later, or something, maybe. When there aren't more important things to do.

Posted 7/25/08 - 11:10 AM


jeri .
0
Zoe, The opposition to this amendment has been strongly supported by our gay brothers and sisters. Rick Rosendall of the GLAA, Deb Golden and Phil Fornaci of the DCPP, Lisa Mottet of the Task Force, and so many, many others. Without these individuals, my personal effort would have been - nada. The community has pulled together in opposition -and I cannot stress the importance of that unity enough. Nourish unity, encourage it...unity is key for the entire LGBT community if we want to realize basic equality and human rights. What could be more important?

Posted 7/25/08 - 12:27 PM


symonds
0
I gathered lot of information. I am very happy to post my comment in this blog. Very nice blog. ----------- symonds Addiction Recovery Washington

Posted 7/26/08 - 2:37 AM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!