PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD  |  WHERE TO FIND THE BLADE    |   WASHBLADE ON MYSPACE    |   RSS  
FRIDAY, JANUARY 9, 2009
 
Please login or create a new account
  ?
HOME
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO GUIDE

THE LATEST
BLADEWIRE
BLADEBLOG
BLOGWATCH
NEWS
 LOCAL
 NATIONAL
 WORLD NEWS
 VIEWPOINT
 ENTERTAINMENT
 ECLIPSE
 OUT IN DC
 CALENDARS
 FITNESS BY GENRE
 BITCH SESSION














EMAIL UPDATES
New to email
updates? Then click here to find out more.
email address

subscribe
unsubscribe
I have read and agree to our terms
and conditions
.


ADVERTISING
GENERAL INFO
E-EDITION
MARKETING

ABOUT US
ABOUT THE BLADE
MASTHEAD
EMPLOYMENT

 

 

 


Dan Furmansky (Blade file photo by Henry Linser)




MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
AMY CAVANAUGH





Printer-friendly Version

Letter to the Editor

Sound Off about this article




 

MORE LOCAL

Catania delays introducing marriage bill
Norton, gay activists urged D.C. Council to postpone action on measure

Fenty to meet with activists on anti-gay violence
New Year’s bashing reported on day meeting is announced

Equality Va. gets new leader — and he’s straight
Blair takes helm as state lawmakers ready pro-gay proposals

Local bid for 2014 Gay Games coming together
Organizations meet Saturday to discuss plan

O’Malley noncommittal on marriage, trans bills
On eve of new session, governor repeats civil union support

Judge sets witness deadline in ‘dinner plate’ assault

Obituary
David Allen VanDyke, 65

Police log


LOCAL

Court upholds Mont. Co. trans bias law
Measure goes into effect as referendum is blocked

AMY CAVANAUGH
Friday, September 12, 2008

The Maryland Court of Appeals ruled this week that Montgomery County’s transgender anti-discrimination measure need not face public referendum and must go into effect.

The court on Tuesday reversed a decision by Circuit Court Judge Robert Greenberg, who had said that Equality Maryland missed the deadline to challenge petition signatures obtained by the conservative Maryland Citizens for a Responsible Government.

That group petitioned to have the anti-discrimination measure put to voters on the Nov. 4 ballot, but Equality Maryland countered in court that some of the petition signatures were improperly obtained.
Jonathan Shurberg, the lead attorney for Equality Maryland, argued the case alongside Natalie Chin, a Lambda Legal staff attorney.

“The bottom line is that the court said a petition sponsor shouldn’t be allowed to cut corners and circumvent legal requirements to get a referendum attacking minority protections on the ballot,” said Chin. “We are very happy that this duly enacted law can take effect and protect a vulnerable group of Montgomery County residents.”

The measure that Montgomery County officials passed last year prohibits “discrimination in housing, employment, public accommodations, cable television service and taxicab service on the basis of gender identity.”

Chin noted Tuesday that the court’s full written opinion had not yet been released.

“We have no details of the decision yet, but everything has been fast tracked and it should come out shortly,” she said. “We feel confident that we stopped the referendum from going forward, but we’ll have to wait to understand the practical effects of the decision when it comes out.”

Local groups celebrated the ruling, which marked the apparent end of a months-long fight to keep the referendum off the ballot.

“We’re thrilled that the rhetoric perpetuated by the Citizens for a Responsible Government has come to an end and the law can go into effect,” said Dan Furmansky, Equality Maryland’s executive director.

Furmansky said Equality Mary-land was ready to explain to voters why the anti-discrimination measure was needed, “but it’s better that our transgender brothers and sisters have these long overdue and vital protections immediately.”

Jody Huckaby, executive director of PFLAG, said that the ruling sent the message that “opponents of equality are not above the law, and our transgender loved ones are not below it.”

“The anti-transgender campaign in Montgomery County was based on bigotry and fueled by misinformation,” she said in a statement.  “It was being forced onto the ballot with no regard for state law or the fundamental rights of our transgender neighbors and allies.”

Chin, who called the ruling a “really important decision,” said the case could set a precedent for the state and country in terms of achieving transgender anti-discrimination rights.

“Montgomery County was the first county to try to take rights away from transgender people, and these kinds of referendums are popping up around the country,” she said. “We hope it will set a precedent to fight these referendum efforts in the future.”

Montgomery County Council-member Duchy Trachtenberg (D-At-Large), a sponsor of the transgender anti-discrimination bill, issued a statement Tuesday calling the court ruling a “victory for justice and equality under the law.”

She also chided the campaign waged by the Citizens for a Responsible Government against the anti-discrimination law.

“We said that this fear-mongering tactic never belonged on the ballot, and … the court agreed,” Trachtenberg said. “The voters are spared an expensive, wrenching process that would have given further amplification to the worst politics of hate and personal attack.”

Dana Beyer, an Equality Maryland board member and Trachtenberg’s legislative aide, said Tuesday
she was “both thrilled and relieved.”

“It was an important victory,” said Beyer, who is transgender.

“Not just for the residents of Montgomery County, but to send a message to the American people that we’re serious about providing equality for all, and that we’re willing as a community to stand up and fight any attempts to discriminate against any segment of our community. I’m looking forward to building on this victory and expanding protections on a statewide basis.”

State Del. Heather Mizeur (D-Montgomery County) also welcomed the court’s decision.

“Today’s ruling throws the question off the ballot and throws discrimination out of the county, blocking this mean-spirited end run around the democratic process,” she said in a statement. “This is not just a victory for our GLBT community, but for fairness, justice and equality for all in Montgomery County.”

But not everyone celebrated the ruling. Maryland Citizens for a Responsible Government called the decision “a loss for democracy, a loss for Montgomery County, and a loss for common sense” in a statement.

Ruth Jacobs, the organization’s president, noted that opponents of the anti-discrimination measure were evaluating their legal options.

“The MCRG is considering a legal challenge to ensure that voters have the chance to be heard on this issue,” she said.

Amy Smith, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, also said the case might not be over.

“We’re very disappointed with this court’s ruling, which suggests that, in America, every citizen does not have a voice,” she said Tuesday. “Today’s court decision sends a clear message that groups with narrow, extreme political agendas can disenfranchise the voters of an entire county. We will work closely with MCRG toward the goal of putting this issue back into the hands of the voters.”

But for Basic Rights Montgomery, a coalition of community leaders and organizations that were ready to fight the anti-discrimination measure, Tuesday’s ruling meant the group could begin working toward the enactment of statewide protections.

“Basic Rights Montgomery was a campaign established to defend the law, so given that the law is no longer in peril, our energies and efforts will move into the realm of passing a statewide anti-discrimination law,” Furmansky said.

Eric Anthony, who last week succeeded Opel Simmons III as Basic Rights Montgomery’s campaign director, said that plans for the future of the campaign were “to be ...

continued on next page


1  |  2

 

email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by the Washington Blade.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.


 

national | local | world | arts | classifieds | real estate | about us

© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy