NOVEMBER 22, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
RELATED STORIES
Maine marriage to be decided by ‘razor-thin election’
Electorate to vote Nov. 3 on whether to retain gay nuptials

Maine marriage to be decided by ‘razor-thin election’
Electorate to vote Nov. 3 on whether to retain gay nuptials

 
MOST VIEWED
 
Maine attorney general to look at same-sex marriage
Question 1 to be voted on in Nov.

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Oct 16, 2009   | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Maine Attorney General Janet Mills has been asked to look into what effect the state’s gay marriage law would have on public school teaching, prompting questions Thursday about whether Mills can render an impartial opinion given her past support of the law.

Maine’s law recognizing same-sex marriages, enacted by the legislature and signed into law by Gov. John Baldacci in May, has been stayed pending the result of a Nov. 3 repeal referendum.

As the campaign on Question 1 has unfolded, repeal supporters have hammered hard at the prospect of having children taught about gay marriage in schools. Opponents of the repeal reject the idea that Maine’s gay marriage law will open the door to teaching same-sex marriage in public schools.

Education Commissioner Susan Gendron, who asked Mills for the analysis, has said Maine’s law will have no impact on curriculum decisions because marriage is not part of the state-approved curriculum.

But in her request for an analysis, Gendron also says questions about the impact of gay marriage on school teachings have persisted and are now being directed to school superintendents. Now, the Department of Education is seeking clarification on the issue.



email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

dr. bob
merritt is, Fl
0
Janet Mills, Maine's A.G. needs to be asked WHY SHE ALLOWED A CONSTITUTIONALLY FLAWED, voting initiative on to a ballot, and whether she would have done the same if it were about Jews Rights, or Black's Rights?   The A.G.;s that allow these are the weak link.  It's a new ballgame, it's about taking unalienable rights AWAY, not granting them. 

Posted 10/21/09 - 11:45 AM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!