NOVEMBER 22, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
MORE INFO
J. Rhodes Perry and Jason A. Terry are volunteers with the D.C. Trans Coalition and can be reached via this publication.
RELATED STORIES
Trans inmate policy draws mixed reviews


Local news in brief
D.C. jails consider new rules for trans inmates

Officials soften objections to DP bill, trans prisoner rule
Activists ‘assured’ proposal rolling back protections for inmates will die

 
MOST VIEWED
 
Better treatment for trans inmates
Mayor Fenty must now put transgender jail policy into practice. These changesrepresent the start of a dialogue, not an end.

HOME > VIEWPOINT > OPINION

Mar 13, 2009  |  By: J. RHODES PERRY and JASON A. TERRY | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

ON FEB. 20, THE D.C. Trans Coalition  received notice from Attorney General Peter Nickles that the city’s Department of Corrections had issued a revised policy on gender classification and housing at D.C.’s jails. This was a victory for us and for the trans community, after a year of continuous advocacy by DCTC to bring the DOC into compliance with the gender identity and gender expression provisions of the District’s Human Rights Act. 

Upon receiving the new policy, we compared the trans community’s demands with the DOC’s final document. Overall, we feel this new policy is an important step in the right direction, but falls short of meeting the spirit and intent of the law.

DCTC members began expressing their concerns to the DOC over its treatment of transgender inmates in January 2008. In April 2008, the D.C. inspector general found that the DOC was not complying with the D.C. Human Rights Act as it applies to protections for gender identity and gender expression. 

Acting under the advice of Attorney General Nickles, the D.C. Human Rights Commission issued a proposed rule last July exempting District custodial agencies from these important provisions. During the public comment period, DCTC gathered comments from nearly 200 D.C. residents opposing the proposed changes — no public comments were submitted in support of these rule changes. DCTC members met twice more with DOC officials over the summer, but attempts at negotiation were rebuffed by the government.

THIS CHAIN OF events led DCTC to formally oppose Nickles’ nomination as attorney general and compelled D.C. Council members to insist that Nickles meet with members of the District’s transgender community in an effort to develop an acceptable policy. A series of meetings soon followed with Nickles, representatives from the DOC and community members negotiating the substance of a revised gender classification and housing policy. 

While we at DCTC feel it was very important for community members to be involved in shaping this policy, we would be remiss if we failed to note that the negotiation process was driven almost entirely by Nickles and his staff. He set the timeline by which the process needed to conclude and DOC issued the policy abruptly with no warning, precluding further negotiation. As a result of the expedited timeline, the DCTC and its partners were unable to get sufficient feedback on the document from those most disenfranchised — transgender individuals who have spent time in D.C.’s jails. We therefore consider the policy issued last month to be a starting point for further discussion, not a conclusion.

NICKLES IS RIGHT to assert that this policy makes D.C. one of the few jurisdictions in the country that provides for gender appropriate housing for transgender inmates. It also includes important provisions regarding respectful treatment of transgender inmates, new protocols for how strip searches will be conducted and ensures transgender people will have access to hormones while incarcerated.

Recognizing these important changes, we strongly believe that additional improvements can and should be made to the policy as we continue moving forward. In the meantime, we want to ensure the new policy translates from paper to practice. DCTC is currently working with our community partners to make that happen. To that end, we are organizing a transgender community forum on March 29 at the Metropolitan Community Church at 2 p.m. It is our goal to gather both reactions to the revised policy as written, as well as any preliminary information regarding its implementation. 

With the information gained from the forum, we intend to begin a more thorough review of the gender classification and housing policy’s implementation and will continue to advocate for improvement where it is necessary. 

Should you wish to become more involved with this campaign, or if you are interested in helping out with the DCTC’s March 29 community forum, please be sure to contact the D.C. Trans Coalition at dctranscoalition@gmail.com.



email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

jeri .
0
Mayor Fenty has done nothing throughout this entire issue, with the exception of supporting his appointed Attorney General, Peter Nickles. Mr. Nickles, on the other hand, has not only patently refused to uphold the District regulations regarding discrimination based on gender identity and expression but actively (and it would appear single-handedly) attempted to roll back and weaken the regulations, and thereby undermine the intent and purpose of the Human Rights Act - which protects us all. Mr. Nickles has also actively opposed progressive legislation expanding the rights and entitlements of Domestic Partnerships within the District. Indeed, after six months time, legislation that has been signed into law (and went unopposed by the US Congress) has still not been implemented based on arbitrary opposition presented by AG Nickles. Soooooo....as the man at the end of the line where the buck stops, Mayor Fenty needs to decide if he wants run for re-election based on his support for Mr. Nickles.....or on his support for the basic Human Rights of all the citizens within the District. That, of course, would include the rights of the entire GLBT community, inclusive of those who identify as transgender.

Posted 3/13/09 - 8:20 AM


Sanchez
Laurel, Md
-1
Oh Lord. With all the issues facing the Nation and the world, we're devoting time and attention to trannies in jail?? First, why are trannies in jail? Why can't they obey the law? Second, trannies want equal protection under the law. With that in mind, why do they think they should be given "special" treatment when in jail? They want equal rights, should be granted equal rights, and should receive equal/fair treatment in jail. Period. Oh my gosh, are we on the verge of a train wreck in this country?

Posted 3/13/09 - 6:48 PM


jeri .
0
sanchez, crawl back under that rock that you live under. please. see, i can even be polite to pathetic bigots such as yourself.

Posted 3/13/09 - 9:16 PM


Sanchez
Laurel, Md
0
jeri: Dear, you have not refuted the merits of my assertions.

Posted 3/14/09 - 2:19 AM


jeri .
1
sanchez, your assertions have no merit. your continued use of the term "trannies" is extremely and intentionally offensive. crawl. under. that. rock.

Posted 3/14/09 - 5:41 AM


Miss Thang
0
What is the city supposed to do, build a special jail just for trannies? That's awfully expensive. If you still have your dinga ling then you go to mens' jail. If you had your ding a ling chopped off and now have a woo ha, then you go to womens' jail, period.. pretty simple. Anyway, in jail you can't wear a dress or fake boobs... you have to wear an orange jumpsuit. What's the issue?

Posted 3/15/09 - 11:43 PM


jeri .
0
if you take the dinga ling an put it in one hand, and put the other hand up your woo ha, you are unable to post stupid comments on blogs concerning serious subject matter that you obviously cannot comprehend. "the issue" is about allowing for basic human dignity and equitable treatment,not special treatment or facilities. ps- don't write back. i would like to keep your image in my mind with your hands where they are.

Posted 3/16/09 - 8:09 AM


Rhodes
Washington, DC
0
The trans community is not demanding special treatment, but rather equal treatment under the DC Human Rights Law - a law that respects sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression. Trans people do obey the law, unfortunately, they get policed and intentionally profiled for being who they are - themselves. Policing trans people is wrong and is a real waste of our taxpayer dollars. For those that want a better flavor of what it's like on the inside, I recommend googling the following reports - It's War In Here, Still in Danger and The Move Along Report - we all want equality.

Posted 3/16/09 - 11:29 AM


jterry
0
It's worth pointing out that no one is asking for special rights here. Rather, we are asking that rights already guaranteed under DC law are enforced for all members of DC's population. As has been reiterated far too many times in this nation's history, rights on paper are absolutely meaningless unless they are enforced. Holding government accountable to its promises is essential to moving us toward a more just and equitable society.

Posted 3/16/09 - 12:05 PM


wjf
Arlington, VA
0
Part 5 (Sanchez continued): So Sanchez, I repeat what I have said before: since the Blade so offends your dogmatic principles, stop read it. Turn your attention to Concerned Women of America and Focus on the Family. Start posting to website supportive of Phyllis Schlafly, Rush Limburgh and Ann Coulter.

Posted 3/16/09 - 7:23 PM


wjf
Arlington, VA
0
Part 4 (Sanchez continued): And all of the above is just from one issue of the Blade! To quote from the New Testament, “you very words convict you.” You consistently oversimplify and overgeneralize issues. Attack is the solace of the weak mind. Your comments are of those who hate us, speaking of “special rights” and numerous and repeated homophobic pronouncements.

Posted 3/16/09 - 7:23 PM


wjf
Arlington, VA
0
Part 3 (Sanchez continued): Nine: Regarding the explosion of HIV in the District, you state that people who get it, desire it and report that you went to the Crew Club last Saturday to do “research” on people practicing unsafe acts. So, just from the above, you disparage women, transgender persons, gays and lesbians serving in the armed forces, gay and lesbians who want to marry, Gay Pride, Ashton Kutcher, President Obama (“The Messiah” as you refer to him), the appointment of openly gay and lesbian people to the new Administration, Rep. Jared Polis, and those who contract HIV.

Posted 3/16/09 - 7:24 PM


wjf
Arlington, VA
0
Part 2 (Sanchez continued): Seven: You criticize the reporting of a lesbian to the Obama Administration as unimportant. Eight: Transsexuals have earned a special place for your distain with comments like “if you don’t like what God and nature gave you between your legs and (sic) change it with your YOUR bucks, not mine;” you defend the attack on transgender persons as the natural reactions to “freaks of nature.” Eight: While the community is proud that Rep. Jared Polis joins Congress as another out member, you compare him to “wide-stance” Larry Craig.

Posted 3/16/09 - 7:24 PM


wjf
Arlington, VA
1
Part 1: Sanchez: you are the poster child for anger management. Let’s review your posts, JUST in the current issue of the Blade. One: You refer to women as “twats,” and gay service men as “femmie twinks.” Two: You ridicule California’s gay marriage initiative, hoping that the California Supreme Court sustains Proposition 8. Three: You ridicule Ashton Kutcher's support for GLBT people implying that he must be gay. Four: You consistently attach the management of the Blade. Five: You defend Vermont Governor’s opposition of gay marriage. Six: You attached gay pride as a “freak show.”

Posted 3/16/09 - 7:24 PM


Hailee
0
To those who continually use the derogatory term 'tranny' you really have to stop.  This is an LGBT medium.  I think it's ridiculous that the Blade allows posts that refer to transgender persons as trannies. They don't publish the word nigger or fagette, so why tranny?

Sanchez and Miss Thang: You're both very ignorant. Go F**k yourselves!

Posted 3/26/09 - 12:22 AM


wjf
Arlington, VA
4
QuoteHailee:

To those who continually use the derogatory term 'tranny' you really have to stop.  This is an LGBT medium.  I think it's ridiculous that the Blade allows posts that refer to transgender persons as trannies. They don't publish the word nigger or fagette, so why tranny?

Sanchez and Miss Thang: You're both very ignorant. Go F**k yourselves!

I wholeheartedy agree with your comment regarding the offensive slang "tranny."  For those of us who are gay, I think it is vitally important to emotionally connect with what it felt and feels like to be called "faggot."  "Tranny" calls us the same type of negative feelings for our transgender brothers and sisters.  trong>We should be at the front of the line defending their rights to be treated with respect and dignity.  Thanks Haileetrong>.

Posted 3/26/09 - 8:33 AM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!