NOVEMBER 22, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
Juan Ahonen-Jover (right) and his partner, Ken Ahonen-Jover, are advocating for an omnibus LGBT rights bill that would enact several new rights and protections at the federal level. (Photo courtesy of Juan Ahonen-Jover)
 
 
RELATED STORIES
Holiday Gift Guide -3-
HRC buying guide helps gay consumers make informed shopping choices

Gay voters in Ind., N.C. relish primary role
HRC announces election initiative, Senate endorsements

HRC’s Solmonese marks first year of ‘narrow focus’
New leader focuses on states, puts ‘membership’ at 387,000

 
MOST VIEWED
 
Gay donors propose omnibus rights bill
Organizers of ‘new approach’ say activists too timid with Congress

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Mar 27, 2009  |  By: Lou Chibbaro Jr.  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

The leaders of a nonprofit LGBT donors group in Florida are calling on members of Congress to introduce a far-reaching omnibus LGBT rights bill that combines all of the gay- and transgender-related bills that have been pending before Congress, some for as long as 30 years.

Called the Equality & Religious Freedom Act, the combined measure also includes new provisions, including a clause that requires the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages, civil unions and domestic partnerships legalized by states.

“We decided that asking for our rights incrementally was not enough,” said Juan Ahonen-Jover of Miami, a gay philanthropist and co-founder of eQualityGiving.org. “We feel the less you ask for, the less you get.”

Ahonen-Jover and his partner, Ken Ahonen-Jover, retained LGBT-rights attorney Karen Doering to draft the proposed bill after arranging for her to conduct extensive legal research on whether the bill should create a freestanding law or amend existing civil rights statutes.

Doering, a former staff attorney for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said she concluded from her research that it would be better for the omnibus bill to amend existing civil rights laws, including the landmark U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964.

She and a corps of activists organized by Juan and Ken Ahonen-Jover decided that the omnibus bill should amend a series of existing civil rights, disability and education laws by adding the protected categories of sexual orientation and gender identity and expression to those laws. The existing laws now bar discrimination based on race, gender, religion and ethnicity, among other categories.

Under the proposed omnibus bill, the limited employment protection provisions for gays and transgender persons in the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or ENDA, which is pending in Congress, would be reintroduced as amendments to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Doering said.

But the proposed omnibus bill goes much further than ENDA by adding sexual orientation and gender identity and protection provisions to more categories in the 1964 Civil Rights Act and other civil rights laws that ENDA’s sponsors in Congress considered too risky to include in ENDA.
Among them are protections from discrimination in housing and public accommodations, such as hotels and restaurants, and in the ability to obtain credit.

“If you think about it, why should we be excluded from those protections?” said Juan Ahonen-Jover. “We agree with President Obama and the people who elected him. They want fundamental change, and we need to change our thinking on these the bills that are supposed to protect our rights.”

The draft Equality & Religious Freedom Act released last week on the eQualityGiving.org web site also includes: language repealing the Defense of Marriage Act; a provision repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell;” a provision incorporating the Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act; and a provision incorporating the Uniting American Families Act, which would give the same immigration rights to foreign-born same-sex domestic partners of American citizens that currently are given to heterosexual foreigners married to Americans.

The Human Right Campaign has argued in the past that lumping several gay rights bills together makes it more difficult to pass a combined measure because members of Congress who oppose one part of such a measure would likely vote against it. Such lawmakers would vote for a narrower bill that doesn’t include the provision they oppose, HRC and other groups have argued.

“The underlying objective of this proposed approach is laudable,” said Trevor Thomas, an HRC spokesperson. “There is a long list of legislative priorities that need to be achieved, but packaging all of these ideas together will not make passage easier.”

Thomas said HRC is advocating for the individual bills that the proposed omnibus measure would combine into a single bill.

“In fact, re-packaging this legislation would require us to rebuild the support that the existing bills have garnered over the years from civil rights, labor, and business groups,” he said, requiring “all this hard work” to be restarted. “What we need is a lot of hard grassroots work and all hands on deck.”

Drew Hammill, a spokesperson for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), said Pelosi would work with gay U.S. Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) and Jared Polis (D-Colo.) to identify the legislative strategy that has the best chance of success.

“The speaker has long been committed to equality and is aware of the numerous proposals that would bring us closer to greater equality — a goal that she shares,” Hammill said.



email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

stephenclark
Washington, DC
1
What a silly idea. It's too bad that aren't doing something useful with their philanthropy.

Posted 3/27/09 - 11:33 AM


wjf
Arlington, VA
1
I believe that this is a trong>profound mistake on a couple of levels.  First of all, a number of organizations – HRC in particular – have been working on these issues and developed alliances with members of Congress and the new administration.  Not to coordinate with HRC is a flawed tactic.  Second, I believe that it is impolitic to assume that all of these (however worthy) LGBT initiatives can be packaged together and passed.  Further, I definitely want to see the research that Karen Doering claims to have that supports an omnibus bill.

Posted 3/27/09 - 1:23 PM


Sanchez
Laurel, Md
0
Farcical approach.  Never happen.

Posted 3/27/09 - 4:43 PM


J Todd
Queens, NY
0
A VISION with a COLLECTIVE call to action!

Posted 3/28/09 - 1:48 PM


HenryHall
0
What they seem to be saying is "We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."  It appears HRC does not believe in that sentiment, it is kind of old fashioned.

Posted 3/28/09 - 3:58 PM


J Todd
Queens, NY
0
There is great virtue when we wage our struggle for ALL LGBTI peoples, together, collectively.   Organizations of vested interests can not control the higher calling.

Posted 3/28/09 - 5:42 PM


stephenclark
Washington, DC
1
J Todd, why did New Yorkers stop police raids on gay bars in the 1970s instead of waiting to do that at the same time they win marriage rights? Should New York not have allowed gay people to adopt children in the 1990s because we didn't yet have support to ban employment discrimination? Should New York not have eliminate its criminal sodomy law in 1980 because it wasn't yet read to allow partner to make health-care decisions for each other? Combining every issue so that none advances until all can advance is silly. The earlier victories pave the way for the later victories.

Posted 3/29/09 - 3:30 AM


wjf
Arlington, VA
2
Quotestephenclark:

J Todd, why did New Yorkers stop police raids on gay bars in the 1970s instead of waiting to do that at the same time they win marriage rights? Should New York not have allowed gay people to adopt children in the 1990s because we didn't yet have support to ban employment discrimination? Should New York not have eliminate its criminal sodomy law in 1980 because it wasn't yet read to allow partner to make health-care decisions for each other? Combining every issue so that none advances until all can advance is silly. The earlier victories pave the way for the later victories.

trong>Well-stated argument!  As I have poarws below, I think this is a trong>profound mistake.

Posted 3/29/09 - 7:26 PM


meb1678
0
Never heard of these guys before, yet they think they can just hire a lawyer to write a bill that would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and fix everything forever if everyone would just listen to *them*??!

Ah, rich people. Always good for a laugh.

 

Posted 3/30/09 - 8:00 AM


cranedsmmit
Hamden, Ct
0
Well this approach certainly recognizes the fact that the right to get married is not the only right we need.  This should move forward and it will bring the education needed to our cause.  I am not surprised so many people have already panned it though, as oppressed people are often unable to act in their own best interest.  I congratulate these two for their initiative.

Posted 3/31/09 - 4:52 PM


Sanchez
Laurel, Md
0
Quotewjf:

trong>Well-stated argument!  As I have poarws below, I think this is a trong>profound mistake.

Dearie, what is the word "poarws"?  I've looked in on-line dictionaries for the last 2 days and cannot find it anywhere.  The learning experience I achieve each time I read your posts is on hold until you clarify "poarws."  Please, I'm dying to know...

Posted 3/31/09 - 8:58 PM


EqualTime
Washington, DC
1
Congrats to these activists for expecting more from our politicians, our political parties, and our movement leaders. And shame on HRC for discouraging such a noble move that will help future generations of LGBT people.  HRC hasn't gotten anything for the community in 20 years.  So their incremental strategy obviously isnt working, and needs to be reassessed.

Until our community starts asking for what we want, we will get crumbs and told that it is a five-course meal. 

I say lets go for it!

Posted 4/1/09 - 5:47 PM


bobzaguy
Chicago, Il
2

Dearie, what is the word "poarws"?

Stop looking Sanchez...it's supposed to be 'posted' — a case of wjf's left hand not being over the a-s-d-f keys on the keyboard but over the s-d-f-g keys instead.

Also a case of the problems created for not proofing what you type before you post. Which would be 'noy ptooginh ehsy you yypr nrgotr you pody' if wjf was still typing.

Posted 4/2/09 - 10:26 AM


bobzaguy
Chicago, Il
1
QuoteEqualTime:

Congrats to these activists for expecting more from our politicians, our political parties, and our movement leaders. And shame on HRC for discouraging such a noble move that will help future generations of LGBT people.  HRC hasn't gotten anything for the community in 20 years.  So their incremental strategy obviously isnt working, and needs to be reassessed.

Until our community starts asking for what we want, we will get crumbs and told that it is a five-course meal. 

I say lets go for it!

Congrats all around to the people who are trying to make this happen in our lifetime. I am all for the complete, real 5-course meal myself. I say "Down With Crumbs". Let's eat at the table with the rest of humanity, not beneath the table like the family pet. 

Posted 4/2/09 - 10:35 AM


mykelb
0
I have been saying this all my life.  The shotgun approach has not worked for my rights as a US citizen (maybe it works for someone's rights as a state citizen, somewhere).  The Civil Rights Act of 1964 should have been amended in 1980.

Posted 4/3/09 - 1:23 PM


Hailee
0
What the LGBT movement is missing is BIG $$$ to persuade the House and Senate members to vote our rights into law. The Ahonen-Jovers have are dead-on but we all seem to buy the HRC approach of 'pay Solomnese $400,000/yr. to do nothing'.

Posted 4/4/09 - 11:24 PM


DCDC
0
Finally, a proactive idea that is on terms and is worth galvonizing a movement behind.  Way to go on this beginning effort!

Posted 4/6/09 - 2:29 PM


Ridgerider
0
YES! FINALLY!!! Please...please...PLEASE give us an aqlternative to the do-nothing HRC!

Posted 4/9/09 - 8:17 PM


J Todd
Queens, NY
0
A VISION with a COLLECTIVE call to ACTION! 

ALL RIGHTS FOR ALL!!!!     ALRIGHT!!!!

 

Posted 4/10/09 - 7:52 PM


J Todd
Queens, NY
0
Quotestephenclark:

J Todd, why did New Yorkers stop police raids on gay bars in the 1970s instead of waiting to do that at the same time they win marriage rights? Should New York not have allowed gay people to adopt children in the 1990s because we didn't yet have support to ban employment discrimination? Should New York not have eliminate its criminal sodomy law in 1980 because it wasn't yet read to allow partner to make health-care decisions for each other? Combining every issue so that none advances until all can advance is silly. The earlier victories pave the way for the later victories.

Yes - earlier victories are VICTORIES.   This does not substantiate the argument that incrementalism is the only and always best approach.   All the work devoted to date has paved the way for the omnibus bill - that is the fruit of our labor.    Let's go for the gold!

Posted 4/10/09 - 7:56 PM


J Todd
Queens, NY
0
Quotestephenclark:

J Todd, why did New Yorkers stop police raids on gay bars in the 1970s instead of waiting to do that at the same time they win marriage rights? Should New York not have allowed gay people to adopt children in the 1990s because we didn't yet have support to ban employment discrimination? Should New York not have eliminate its criminal sodomy law in 1980 because it wasn't yet read to allow partner to make health-care decisions for each other? Combining every issue so that none advances until all can advance is silly. The earlier victories pave the way for the later victories.

Hi - I thought I replied already... but I don't see it... so let me try to restate my answer...   our earlier gains have been huge victories and necessary perhaps first steps - but that doesn't mean that incrementalism is the only or best approach - and those earlier victories have exactly paved the way for this next larger leap...  nothing wrong with such a trajectory being consistent.

Posted 4/10/09 - 8:43 PM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!