NOVEMBER 23, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
RELATED STORIES
House nixes hate crimes
Frank faults strategy, calls for freestanding bill in 2008

Hate crimes bill in Senate limbo
Congressional leaders mum on timetable; Pelosi expects ENDA vote in Septembe

Democrats may drop hate crimes from defense bill
New FBI data shows increase in violence targeting gays

 
MOST VIEWED
 
Hate crimes measure to ride on defense bill
Strategy resembles 2007 plan to pass federal proposal

HOME > NEWS > NATIONAL NEWS

Jul 03, 2009  |  By: Chris Johnson  | COMMENTS      Printer Friendly Version

U.S. Senate leaders intend to pass a hate crimes measure next month as an amendment to the defense authorization bill even as President Obama has threatened to veto the bill based on language in the House version, according to sources.

David Smith, HRC’s vice president of programs, said in a June 26 statement to the Blade that the Senate would probably pass the bill in this way.

“The [Department of Defense] authorization bill as well as other vehicles have been under consideration since House passage earlier this year,” he said. “Between now and the August recess, DOD appears to be the most likely candidate for hate crimes.”

A senior Senate Democratic aide confirmed that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid intended to pass hate crimes legislation as an amendment to the fiscal year 2010 defense authorization bill.

“We understand the House has concerns, but we have yet to find another vehicle that will work,” the aide said.

The Senate’s plan is identical to what happened in 2007, when the Senate attempted to pass hate crimes legislation by amending the fiscal year 2008 Defense Authorization Act. Anti-war lawmakers and conservatives banded together to remove the language from the legislation and the hate crimes provision didn’t become law.

Smith said a vote on the defense bill is tentatively scheduled in the Senate by mid July, but added that “as with any Senate scheduled bill, that could change.”

Upon hearing of the Senate’s plan, gay Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said he’s “disappointed” the Senate settled on this method of passage. But he added “we could still be all right” because the House passed its version of the defense bill with a bigger margin than he expected.

Still, he expressed concern about how Obama has threatened to veto the House version of the defense bill because it contains funding beyond the administration’s request for F-22 fighter jets.

Frank said passing a hate crimes measure as an amendment to the defense bill would stand a better chance if the Senate didn’t follow suit and declined to provide additional funding for the jets.

A White House spokesperson declined to comment on the situation.

The Senate aide noted that Reid had pledged to pass hate crime legislation by August recess and said the defense bill is the only option as a vehicle before that time.

A standalone bill submitted to the Senate floor would be vulnerable to dangerous amendments, such as a measure that would ban same-sex marriage in D.C., the he said.

The aide said the Senate will “hopefully” approve the hate crimes measure, but added that “it’s going to be very, very close … as it has been in the past.”

Smith noted that passing the measure as an amendment to the defense bill has “advantages and disadvantages … as with any other vehicle.”

“Our job is to be clear about the objective, hold the Senate’s feet to the fire, and mobilize our community to help achieve passage,” he said.

Federal hate crimes legislation would enable the Justice Depart-ment to assist in the prosecution of hate crimes committed against LGBT people that result in death or serious injury.

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) introduced a version of the bill earlier this year in the Senate. The House passed another version of the legislation on April 29, 249-175.

Sexual orientation-inclusive hate crimes bills have languished in Congress since they were first introduced in 1997.

In memory of Matthew Shepard, a gay college student who was murdered in 1998 near Laramie, Wyo., the Senate version of the legislation is known as the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act.



email       password


Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Truth Monger
1
Here we go again. No matter how close we come to a victory in the end it's always something to dash the hopes and dreams of the community finally getting some justice. No matter who the hell is in charge we always end up being screwed in the end. 

Posted 7/3/09 - 8:00 PM


BruceInMissouri
Columbia, Mo
1
QuoteTruth Monger: Here we go again. No matter how close we come to a victory in the end it's always something to dash the hopes and dreams of the community finally getting some justice. No matter who the hell is in charge we always end up being screwed in the end. 

After reading this article I'm reminded of the saying, "There are two things you don't want to see being made:  laws and hot dogs." 

I am extremely frustrated with the way the Senate leadership is handling the hate crimes bill.  First they were going to vote on the house bill as a stand alone bill.  Then they were going to attach it to an obscure travel bill.  Now they want to attach it to a defense bill that Obama is threatening to veto because it spends too much.  The Senate leadership doesn't care about passing hate crimes legislation -- they just want to get their pork-barrel spending approved.  If they send that bill to Obama's desk, he will have to choose between hate crimes legislation and wasting taxpayer money on extra F-22 fighter jets we don't need.  Sounds like we are setting ourselves up for a repeat of what happened in 2007.  Can't Harry Reid do better than this?  Maybe its time for more inspired Senate leadership.

With the addition of Al Frankin, is there any chance there might be 60 votes to cut off debate and pass the house bill without amendment? 

Now I understand why it took the Senate 105 years to apologize for not passing an anti-lynching bill.  If it is this hard to pass a hate crimes bill, just imagine how hard it is going to be to pass ENDA or UAFA, or repeal DADT or DOMA.

Posted 7/6/09 - 5:50 PM


mushroomhead
-1
QuoteTruth Monger: Here we go again. No matter how close we come to a victory in the end it's always something to dash the hopes and dreams of the community finally getting some justice. No matter who the hell is in charge we always end up being screwed in the end. 

My violin plays for you, you poor victim...

Posted 7/7/09 - 10:06 PM


mushroomhead
-1
QuoteBruceInMissouri: After reading this article I'm reminded of the saying, "There are two things you don't want to see being made:  laws and hot dogs." 

I am extremely frustrated with the way the Senate leadership is handling the hate crimes bill.  First they were going to vote on the house bill as a stand alone bill.  Then they were going to attach it to an obscure travel bill.  Now they want to attach it to a defense bill that Obama is threatening to veto because it spends too much.  The Senate leadership doesn't care about passing hate crimes legislation -- they just want to get their pork-barrel spending approved.  If they send that bill to Obama's desk, he will have to choose between hate crimes legislation and wasting taxpayer money on extra F-22 fighter jets we don't need.  Sounds like we are setting ourselves up for a repeat of what happened in 2007.  Can't Harry Reid do better than this?  Maybe its time for more inspired Senate leadership.

With the addition of Al Frankin, is there any chance there might be 60 votes to cut off debate and pass the house bill without amendment? 

Now I understand why it took the Senate 105 years to apologize for not passing an anti-lynching bill.  If it is this hard to pass a hate crimes bill, just imagine how hard it is going to be to pass ENDA or UAFA, or repeal DADT or DOMA.

Whiner. Period.

Posted 7/7/09 - 10:07 PM


ReasonableDoubt
Washington, DC
2
Quotemushroomhead: My violin plays for you, you poor victim...

Ugh.  You are so intensly dislikable in every possible way.  It is no wonder you are such a patheticly self-loathing creature; no one, not even you, could possibly stand being in your company for long.

Posted 7/8/09 - 7:14 PM


Truth Monger
0
Mushroomhead: Do I need to tell you what to do with your violin bow?

Posted 7/8/09 - 7:45 PM


Truth Monger
0
QuoteReasonableDoubt: Ugh.  You are so intensly dislikable in every possible way.  It is no wonder you are such a patheticly self-loathing creature; no one, not even you, could possibly stand being in your company for long.

If anyone is likely to be the target for a hate crime it would be Mushroomhead. I hope his ass gets the kicking it so richly deserves someday for all the unending contemptable, obnoxious and hateful comments he has made against gay Americans and the just advancement of their rights on a gay publication to add insult to injury! Hopefully it will be a mob of feedup gay men, Lesbians and Transgenders and their straight allies.  The Blade Management should be ashamed of itself for allowing it. Do you think a christian conservative blog would allow us to comment in their forum against their attacks on us and their lies and hysteria they spread?? Absolutely NOT!

Posted 7/9/09 - 11:34 AM


mushroomhead
0
QuoteTruth Monger: If anyone is likely to be the target for a hate crime it would be Mushroomhead. I hope his ass gets the kicking it so richly deserves someday for all the unending contemptable, obnoxious and hateful comments he has made against gay Americans and the just advancement of their rights on a gay publication to add insult to injury! Hopefully it will be a mob of feedup gay men, Lesbians and Transgenders and their straight allies.  The Blade Management should be ashamed of itself for allowing it. Do you think a christian conservative blog would allow us to comment in their forum against their attacks on us and their lies and hysteria they spread?? Absolutely NOT!

You're playing the victim card, again.

This, presumably, is an open forum unless I've missed the litmus test for participating. Please advise me.

You speak your mind and write about your beliefs.  I, a gay male, do the same.  Is that not what equality is all about??  Or, is equality only in accordance with YOUR definition?

Posted 7/9/09 - 7:27 PM


mushroomhead
0
QuoteTruth Monger: If anyone is likely to be the target for a hate crime it would be Mushroomhead. I hope his ass gets the kicking it so richly deserves someday for all the unending contemptable, obnoxious and hateful comments he has made against gay Americans and the just advancement of their rights on a gay publication to add insult to injury! Hopefully it will be a mob of feedup gay men, Lesbians and Transgenders and their straight allies.  The Blade Management should be ashamed of itself for allowing it. Do you think a christian conservative blog would allow us to comment in their forum against their attacks on us and their lies and hysteria they spread?? Absolutely NOT!

One other thing.  You're fully free to participate in the conservative Gay Patriot blog.  You can post your left wing liberal views there just as I post mine here. 

Further, I would never wish an assault on you, whether we agree or choose to disagree on any issue, gay or otherwise.  Your words, however, in wishing an assault on me are at best immature and at worse shameful.  Think about it.

Posted 7/9/09 - 7:34 PM


Spacer
Spacer
Spacer

Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!