NOVEMBER 16, 2009
   Login or create a new account  ?
Join Washington Blade on FacebookJoin Washingtonblade on MyspaceJoin Washington Blade on Twitter!
The Latest:
Vt. gov. opposes gay marriage bill
Gov. Douglas calls civil unions 'sufficient'

Gov. Jim Douglas says he will oppose a bill to allow same-sex couples to marry in Vermont.

In some of his strongest criticism to the idea yet, the Republican governor says he'd rather lawmakers not take up the issue this year, instead focusing on the economy.

Douglas says he believes Vermont's law allowing same-sex couples to enter civil unions is sufficient to provide equal rights to gay and lesbian Vermonters.

He says he's also concerned about the divisiveness of the issue.


Permalink


Spacer
email password
 
Please review and follow Washington Blade’s current Comment and Discussion Policy. Guidelines updated as of August 22nd, 2009. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

rpcv84
Laurel, MD
0
There are far more important things for governments to concern themselves with than gay marriage. When the public's ready for it, and the time is right, it will happen.

Posted 11/23/08 - 11:56 PM


Equalnotspecial
Sonoma, Ca
0
It appears facts will not change a conclusion based on emotion. I think we need to concentrate on ending DADT as it is the most blatant government sponsorship of discrimination, and it's existence teaches that discrimination is ok. Ending it and teaching tolerance instead will help in the fight for equality in other areas including marriage

Posted 11/22/08 - 11:41 AM


RCS
0
Where in the world is the evidence that it would be divisive? Civil unions were supposed to be the end of the world in Vermont, according to the far-right, with any legislator supporting that legislation being booted out of office. That didn't happen. It's time to pass full same-sex marriage in Vermont and get it over with. Two years hence it will be an old news story that no-one will even be paying any attention to up there.

Posted 11/20/08 - 7:30 PM


Eddie89
Phoenix, Az
0
He calls it "divisiveness". I call it "separate but equal is not equal". I'm sure in his mind, having separate drinking fountains for straights and gays means that they both get to drink. There's no discrimination by forcing gays and lesbians to use separate facilities. Governor Douglas couldn't be more wrong on this important issue. Well, important to gays and lesbians.

Posted 11/20/08 - 7:08 PM


Fed DP benefits bill to get markup
Committee to consider measure Nov. 18
Lawmakers defy church pressure on same-sex marriage
D.C. City Council refuses to change measure
2 charged after vandalism at gay center, fight with police in Memphis
Both suspects charged with assault, vandalism
Ex-pastor Ted Haggard holds home prayer meeting
Haggard: I have 'more compassion for gays' because of trials


Georgetown students unnerved after anti-gay attacks
‘I thought D.C. was more open and things like this wouldn’t happen’

Marriage vote set for Dec. 1
D.C. Council committee votes 4-1 to kill broad religious exemption

Guessing game in New York
Paterson to push marriage bill next week after false start

U.S. Attorney’s office reps grilled over Hunter killing
Prosecutor ‘never heard’ of gay panic defense

Email signup EMAIL SIGNUP Facebook FACEBOOK
RSS field RSS FEED Twitter TWITTER
Page by page PAGE BY PAGE Sign up SIGN UP
Find the Blade FIND THE BLADE Feedback FEEDBACK
Masthead MASTHEAD Advertise ADVERTISE
MySpace MYSPACE Privacy PRIVACY
Washington Blade Window Media CONTACT US: E-mail | Masthead | Location and Directions
© 2009 | A Window Media LLC Publication | Privacy Policy
Advertise with us!